Arch, Arch, Ubuntu, Ubuntu, Arch, Ubuntu

>Arch, Arch, Ubuntu, Ubuntu, Arch, Ubuntu
Ubuntu and Arch are the only relevant distros, it's settled science

Attached: Screenshot_2022-07-10_20-04-03.png (373x282, 37.62K)

Other urls found in this thread:

github.com/void-linux/void-packages/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

a thread died for this

>he doesn't know about Chromebooks
Gentoo won, get over it.

Manjaro being this popular is embarrassing.

For me, it's Kubuntu.

Attached: 2048px-Kubuntu_logo.svg(4).png (2048x2048, 125.88K)

How can anyone use a distro with such name?

>Arch, Arch, Shitty Debian, Shitty Debian, Arch, Shitty Debian

Attached: fixed.jpg (700x571, 131.92K)

Its comfy along mint desu

I think it's supposed to be the Spanish word manjar which means delicacy.

>Steam stats
Of course the most popular distros will be the ones that require a lot of tweaking or the OOTB ones.
This is a transitional period where the "smart" people figure out linux in arch, and the retards reap the rewards of their work on their buntu of choice.

This will gradually change as linux becomes more popular, if it does become popular.
For now, stop with your dumb comparisons because:
1. Arch still uses systemd
2. Arch has the AUR which is a crutch and breaks systems left and rihjt
3. pacman is a terrible package manager, and can still brick your shit if you -Syu package
4. Arch has a repulsive community of self-proclaimed geniuses and elitists, making newbies feel like arch is the best you can have.
5. Ubuntu still uses snap, apt and systemd.
6. Ubuntu has issues with package management, dependency hell and people who wrongly assume it's an OOTB distro.
7. Manjaro has many issues, one of them being installed with the AUR enabled, making system-death inevitable.