Isn't VP9 made by google? Why are you all so excited about VP9?

Isn't VP9 made by google? Why are you all so excited about VP9?

Attached: Vp9-logo-for-mediawiki.svg.png (1280x581, 73.87K)

everything webm is developed by google

webm and webp is fagets

It would be nice if computers only had exactly one video and image format. Like for better or for worse, this is what you get. Everything would just work.

Attached: 1657419107934.jpg (733x669, 117.13K)

That would be very inefficient in terms of data size, energy consumption and CPU time.

Linux is made by google

internet is meant for white man and white man only, no need to support street shitters, we could live in properity, instead we choose to let them poison our minds

dilate

The WebM container itself is a subset of Matroska though. And Google has nothing to do with Vorbis or Opus so that's far from (((everything))) in my book.

Should have added AV1 while they were at it

AV1 only offers around 10-20% better compression efficiency compared to 10-bit VP9/HEVC while at the same time takes 10X longer to encode. If efficiency jumps to 30-40% then the sub-1 FPS encode times will be worth it.

>VP9
>patented
no, thanks

Because as much as everyone hates the borg there's a far more insidious and utterly evil entity: mpeg la. They've been known to go after individual users for uploading H264/HEVC content on the internet without paying (((royalty))) fees. VP9 is open sores, royalty free, and encodes 10X faster compared to AV1.

>what is svt-av1

What part of
>AV1 only offers around 10-20% better compression efficiency compared to 10-bit VP9/HEVC while at the same time takes 10X longer to encode.
did you not understand?

>>what is svt-av1
Shit nobody ever heard of

>Why are you all so excited about VP9?
It was released almost a decade ago.

>webm
>one video format
>meanwhile
>vp8
>vp9
>vp10
>vp11
>vp12
>vp13
>vp14
>vp15
>etc.

SVT-AV1 is much better than VP9 *and* faster.
It also has documentation that isn't dogshit.

No thanks cabalnigger/madshit shill

Both codecs are googleshit, but AV1 isn't exclusively googleshit and it shows.

You will never be Japanese, 10 bit is a shit meme and your cabal is dead.

It doesn't matter who made it; the codecs are open source and freely available. You can use them without google getting a single cent from you.

No it isn't you fucking donkey. You only get a few FPS with preset 4 just to match compression efficiency of the quality preset of SVT-VP9. To get the additional 10-20% you need to drop down to preset 0 which encodes at LESS than 1 FPS.

>It would be nice if computers only had exactly one video [...] format. Like for better or for worse, this is what you get.
I don't think you'd say that if you were familiar with the shit codecs we started out with.

>image format
This is basically already the case, with jpg, which is ubiquitous. Of course png also exists and svg also exist, but for good reasons; jpg is specifically optimized for photography, not vector graphics.

Not quite

Attached: file.png (1032x985, 170.59K)

>It would be nice if computers only had exactly one video and image format
BMP.
also we should make MJPEG alternative but with BMPs, mjpeg is just jpeg files in zip

VP9 was released NINE YEARS AGO
VP10 isn't happening, google went all in on AV1 instead.

>SVT-VP9
Can you run this thing with ffmpeg? Most people are going to use libvpx, which is quite horrible.