If you don't use Arch you have chosen an inferior operating system, and that's a fact. Fight me. Let's hear ONE argument against Arch Linux
If you don't use Arch you have chosen an inferior operating system, and that's a fact. Fight me...
*VROOOOOOOOOOM*
Contrarian detected
>Let's hear ONE argument against Arch Linux
Packages are compiled with everything enabled and include dev stuff with them
MOOOOOOM CANCEL MY MEEETIIIINGS
Bloated systemd using piece of shit
I just like Debian
There's no way to prevent installation of non-free packages
It's a half-ass system for half-assers and you should have graduated to Slackware 10 years ago
Not an argument.
Schizo
Kys
Schizo
I agree it's breddy good
Everyone who disagrees with me is a schizo!
better to use ungoogled-Debian, also known as Devuan
I need to lose weight. Its only a coincidence I use Arch
Am I too far gone or can I shed most of this with training?
systemd antis really do put the tard in freetard
not lenny's fault you can't read code
can probably shed with like a month of lifting. nbd
>ONE argument
It uses pacman
It doesn't have a gui installer
first of all pacman is comfy
second of all you can just opt to use a different package manager, if you use arch and dont configure it to your preference you're doing it wrong
Pacman's command syntax is trash and unintuitive
Arch has no official GUI installer
Doesn'r support .deb or .rpm packages, enjoy compiling programs for source every time something isn't on the AUR.
Arch = jobless autistic retard
zfs wouldn't automount, sorry m8, and no btrfs is not even close to become a viable substitute.
>comfy
which is autism speak for just awful but it feels like home because I don't deserve nice things