Display design arguably peaked at the CRT era, now everything looks the same. Anymore examples of aesthetic CRTs?

Display design arguably peaked at the CRT era, now everything looks the same. Anymore examples of aesthetic CRTs?

Attached: P0016186.jpg (720x480, 103.64K)

All old Trinitrons are super aesthethic, but for more modern monitors (1999+) P1110 and this NEC of mine are pretty nice.

Attached: IMG_0083.jpg (2592x1944, 1.66M)

Attached: 507012a.jpg (1000x912, 47.66K)

Attached: c3fb9fd6-e132-45d4-818e-6e390e345296.jpg (1600x1200, 182.1K)

delet this

Attached: 1656941566602.gif (200x219, 154.76K)

whats wrong with it?
I almost picked it up but 80k hours is kinda brutal so I passed, still really like the design though

Sex the mink

Attached: 1641674601178.jpg (3840x2160, 2.49M)

>now everything looks the same.
As opposed to the white/beige glass and plastic boxes that infested 90s desks?

that subtle off white tone, the colorfull logo in the corner, the way it breaks expectations of monitors becoming smalle at the end very tastefull.

Attached: 1650568815111.jpg (4608x3456, 3.79M)

Everything managed to look different without relying on flashy colors or blinking lights

Attached: 1646011727015.jpg (3264x2448, 2.15M)

kino

Attached: P1110-786F.jpg (1024x768, 126.73K)

Monitor doesn't need any design. All you need is the screen. No bezels, no stand, nothing. Today's monitors are near perfect.

>bezels
When did this meme start?
Even if you have no Border around teh screen, suddenly the wall behind your monitor is your bezel

Hey I have a crt monitor but my graphics card (gtx 1060 6gb) doesn't have a VGA or DVI-I port. Can I use the VGA port for my mother board and use the integrated graphics (AMD Ryzen 7 5700G) while still using my gtx 1060 without there being any issues? I know that it works for 2 separate that both have HDMI but I'm just wondering if it being analogue will cause any issues.

Just buy S3 Virge. With great CRT, comes great GPU. You CRTfags are all retarded.

I don't want to spend money I don't care if my gpu is shit I just want to know if I can use my monitor with what I currently have.

fuck I just remembered what the S3 Virge is... I've made a fool of myself

Displayport to VGA adapter, specifically the delock 62967 has been good to me

All adapters I've looked at (including that one) lock it to 60hz when my monitor can do 169hz at max resolution which is why I want to know if the ports on my pc will work without issue.

Enough with these CRT shill threads holy fuck. Every day with you faggots. Just make a general so this shit can be filtered.

its not locked to 60hz, unless you have an F520 or 2070SB I doubt you could reach the adapters limits.

Attached: 1653143192448.jpg (4608x3240, 3.62M)

No the Delock 62967 does not lock to 60hz. I've ran my GDM-F520 at 1200p110hz with it, and my NEC at silly stuff like 960i200hz.

If your OS and drivers support it, why not? It does add slightly more latency than native or adapters though.

Attached: FUpaKguUsAY6EuQ.jpg (1240x1754, 269.96K)

you can filter the word CRT allready why would it need to be a general to be filterable?

80k hours doesnt mean its the same tube, they used to replace them after x hours
you might have fucked up

damn, I really thought that the adapters were locked to 60hz since that's the highest stated on the site.

Attached: file.png (576x127, 12.91K)

>thread about aesthethic CRT monitors
>spams the thread with the ugliest most generic and hated monitors taken with a 2MP phone camera with a lens smeared in vaseline

it was only a BVM anyways not a multiscan, the person that ended up buying probably wants it for retro consoles and stuff so it will be better in their hands.
Dont really need broadcast stuff, I would like a pair of white PVMs for the design though

Its the highest it will do at 2560X1600,
the lower the resolution the more HZ you can have with crts

yeah I knew that was the case with CRT's themselves I guess I just didn't think it applied to the adapters as well

horrible taste, superbrights are very aestethic

Attached: 1643911697519.jpg (3840x2160, 2.39M)