>First C compilers were proprietary and closed-source
>Proprietary software is malware obviously
>Proprietary C compiler compiles GCC, inserts malware into GCC
>All software compiled with GCC is actually malware
How do freetards cope with this?
First C compilers were proprietary and closed-source
Other urls found in this thread:
genius.cat-v.org
savannah.nongnu.org
gnu.org
twitter.com
>le freetard buzzword
>le redditjak jpeg
you don't... you figured it all out... we're fucked from the start and should just start buying amazon alexas
compile hello world
look at assembly output
don't see any malware code
Malware in the assembler
>compile assembler
>look at assembler code
>no malware
>write compiler in machine code in edit.com
based
i actually lol'd it's so dumb. 4/10 for trolling, 8/10 for humor
guix full source bootstrap /thread
>Build own cpu and own compiler
>Check gcc source cod on it and compile it
>Profit
Or you know, just stop being a shizzo...
...
Wait does this mean windows is malware now?
there's malware in your disassembler that hides the malware in the code you're disassembling
>>First C compilers were proprietary and closed-source
Weren't they source-available?
>>Proprietary C compiler compiles GCC, inserts malware into GCC
savannah.nongnu.org
gnu.org
it's an http site dude, stop being a schizo
it's a basic compiler dude, stop being a schizo
Who's to say GCC was compiled with the original CC?
As far as I'm aware, the first version of GCC not released to the public was written in native assembler and assembled using GAS (GNU's Assembler), then rewritten in C and recompiled with the original version of itself and released to the public.
That's because the glowies hid the malware in the linker
If windows was compiled with GCC, does that make it GNU/Windows ?
check machine code, see no malware, take meds