Linux is bad because it can't run legacy windows trash my windows pc barely runs

>Linux is bad because it can't run legacy windows trash my windows pc barely runs

Attached: fnfja.jpg (200x200, 6.36K)

i use linux desu, but stop coping. people complain that linux can't run basic crap like photoshop or gaymes or other proprietary stuff, which is valid.

I don't understand how adobe refusing to relaease photoshop on linux is somehow a problem with the OS

>adobe won't release photoshop
>person wants to use photoshop
>photoshop isn't available on linux
>person doesn't want to use linux
it's literally that simple

holy gem

>Person doesn't want to use linux
Not the topic here.

It's not a problem with the os, but a problem what the system brings on the table.
If the desired software cannot run on that underlying software, any sane person just uses a different underlying software.

Stop coping Linux fags.
Unless u get big tech to release shit for linux, you're doomed.

that's literally the topic here, stop being retarded
see if you're still confused.

The legacy windows trash in question

Attached: win98filepicker.png (440x495, 124.26K)

You could argue the same for TempleOS. If there does not exist a market for this software on Linux then these companies are not going to port it all over, when you use Linux your not just buying into the OS you're also buying into it's community. That being said Linux is still superior, I won't defend my statement as it is objectively true whatever your use case might be.