Why are you using .mp3 for your music files, when the superior .mp4 exists?

why are you using .mp3 for your music files, when the superior .mp4 exists?

Attached: w11.jpg (2048x1365, 162.63K)

What?

why use x codec when x container exists
do the ACK

.m4a you mean.

>doesn't know what opus is

why are you using .mp3 for your music files, when the superior .mp4 exists?

no, mp4

mp4 is much more widespread

>mp4 is much more widespread
i will use opus, thanks

I use FLAC.

Why are you using mp4 when mkv exists
Also all fields because OP's question is so retarded I can't even

>mp4 is much more widespread
mp3 even more

yes but mp4 is superior because it enables video on top, where mp3 does not

"mp3" is just shorthand for "MPEG-1 Layer 3", it's part of the mpeg-1 standard, which includes video (typically just called "mpeg1" or ".mpg")

>mp5 has been around since 1966
you guys really use obsolete tech?

Attached: mp5.jpg (4028x2252, 2.8M)

inb4 rotational velocidensity

Attached: flac elephant.png (800x800, 369.58K)

Flac exists if you want edit it, or avoid generation loss

wtf are zou memeing about? there is a huge difference between a 128mp3 and a vinyl record or a flac, depending on the source material of course

>zou

Attached: angry bald space marine.jpg (126x123, 3.2K)

i say yes to mp4

Attached: jamp4.png (364x146, 16.41K)

fckn german qwertz keyboard

Attached: 6-80-W67C0-070-1-WHITE-LED-TASTATUR-KEYBOARD-QWERTZ-GERMAN-CLEVO-W67x-1_600x600.jpg (237x85, 5.55K)

>not buying an american keyboard
do western europeans really

if it's not broken why fix it