This is not American...

This is not American. Imagine being so retarded you're screaming about a nominee who has the highest educational pedigree and a lifetime in her chosen field while celebrating a "those who can't, teach" woman with no real experience just because she says "ABORTION BAD". The Republcan party is what fetal alcohol syndrome looks like.

Attached: 493.jpg (1065x1015, 174.43K)

She does, however know what a woman is.

Why do people post things like this? Can’t we just post creepshots and social nudes? Nobody is nominated it the Supreme Court since Dubya, who isn’t qualified or Intelligent enough to do the job. It’s politics on both sides and both say the same stupid crap and cry foul. If you can’t see that, you are the retard

When did she answer this question?

Manlet commie Robert reich. I can’t believe people still listen to this idiot

>both say the same stupid crap and cry foul
Obama didn't push anyone at the end of his term because he thought it would be improper.
Trump rushed ACB through because the republicans knew he was going to be voted out.
Mitch McConnel strongly argued to make sure Obama didn't push anyone. When Trump did it, he said that politics was different now. In 4 years the republican party went from a right-wing party to a party of adult shit-stirrers who don't care to even try and pretend that they care about helping the country

>This is not American.
It's perfectly American. Trump was impeached, but not convicted, and had every right to nominate a SC justice. The popular vote does not matter in presidential elections, only the Electoral College vote. And the distribution of Senate seats is not based on population, so his point in that regard is irrelevant. This is the American system. Cope.
>"those who can't, teach" woman with no real experience
In addition to teaching, Amy Three Names worked in a prestigious Washington D.C. law firm and served as a U.S. Court of Appeals judge.

None of what Reich or you said is relevant or meaningful. Now go back to seal clapping for your favorite sheboon.

>Obama didn't push anyone at the end of his term because he thought it would be improper.
Obama nominated Garland, which was his right. The Senate declined to give their consent to the nomination, which was their right. Dilate.

based

/thread

Speaking of Rober Riech he was secretary of labor in the cabinet of an impeached president.

We don't even mention Dunning-Kreuger anymore. It's too common.

He's better known as an economist. Not sure what the department of labor had to do with a blowjob.

republicans...

It wouldn’t have mattered what Obama did. He didn’t have the votes in the senate. The stupidly of The Republican senators was acting like the upcoming election was the reason. It was pure power and they should have owned up to it. The current hearings are being touted as offensive when they accused a man a few years ago of being a rapist. When it wasn’t proven now they say “credibly accused”. No proven seems to suggest not credibly accused. Don’t get me wrong the republicans are a bunch do idiots but to think either side is anything less than fucking idiots is what is stupid

>This vacancy arose during Obama's final year as president. Hours after Scalia's death was announced, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said he would consider any appointment by the sitting president to be null and void. He said the next Supreme Court justice should be chosen by the next president—to be elected later that year.[1][2][3] Senate Democrats criticized the move as being unprecedented, and responded saying that there was sufficient time to vote on a nominee before the election.[4]
>The 11 members of the Senate Judiciary Committee's Republican majority refused to conduct the hearings necessary to advance the vote to the Senate at large, and Garland's nomination expired on January 3, 2017, with the end of the 114th Congress, 293 days after it had been submitted to the Senate.[10] This marked the first time since the Civil War that a nominee whose nomination had not been withdrawn had failed to receive consideration for an open seat on the Court.
>Attention returned to the nomination in fall 2020 after the death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, when many Democrats and some commentators contended that Republicans violated the precedent they had established for Garland by voting to confirm Amy Coney Barrett to the court.[12][13]

>tldr; republicans are hypocrites, big surprise

Finally, I can actually thank OP for something for the first time in a Any Forums thread. I appreciate you making me realize just how out of touch I am with retarded nonsense, it feels great to actually have no idea what you're talking about. Thanks.

It came down to votes. No matter what the outcomes were going to happen due to votes. What politicians say and what actually is happening are two different things. No surprise there.

>republicans are hypocrites
McConnell pointed out that Biden had proposed the same thing in the Senate when the tables had been turned in the past. I guess Democrats are hypocrites, too.

When you're ready to grow up and get off the two party plantation, adulthood awaits, user.

Abortion up to 3 months is reasonable for reasons such as rape/incest or even indecision or life preparedness. That is what it means by saying "my body my choice", you %100 get to make that choice, but that doesn't mean you get to fence-sit with the process of creating life, or life will fuck you over. It takes two to tango, and someone doesn't deserve to just not be born after a certain point. ~First trimester are a compromise between respecting life and our role in its creation, and human nature for self-determination of our respective futures.

Do you think republicans liked Kavanaugh because they blackmail him with the college rape stuff? Then, it went public. Maybe he had other skeletons?

The only solution at this point is killing all the conservative politicians, castrating their voters so they can't reproduce anymore and taking the kids they already have to fix the conservative indoctrination they've already been forcing into their heads so far
A lot of people will say this is rather drastic but i say fascists dont deserve rights anyways

I doubt they planned on blackmailing. Removing a sitting justice is near impossible and the allegations lacked any hard evidence so there isn't much they could've done if he ignored their attempts after getting confirmed.
It's more likely that they doubled-down because withdrawing him would make dems seem strong and repubs seem weak. Plus it became a proxy war for the whole cancel culture shit.

Kek. This nigger thinks Presidential elections is like a highschoolers voting for king and queens

Biden has said a million things. Using him as an example/justification is just stupid because if you go back far enough he's literally said everything imaginable on both sides.

>against free child care
>against health care
>against free comm college
>pro child poverty

republicans can eat shit. The pro-shitty-life party can all neck their traitorous asses.

Attached: 1647386112769.jpg (960x666, 188.67K)

All I see here is
>I WANT FREE SHIT

>A lot of people will say this is rather drastic but i say fascists dont deserve rights anyways

The irony in your post is mind numbing

>implying that isn't exactly what elections are
They're popularity contests and the majority of people voting are retards who have no knowledge of what they're voting for

How cucked do you have to be to think this, much less post it?

Thing is im past caring
We'll see how things play out when y'all realize actual leftists are just as progun as you

>I don't want my tax-dollars going towards giving people better lives and better quality of living
>I'd much rather they were spent on subsidising billionaires and giving an over-inflated budget to an ineffective military that does shit all

Against socialism. Next

Genuine question, what do you think taxes should be spent on?

Attached: 8HEzvSW.jpg (600x582, 208.96K)

“Free” just means taxpayer funded and fully controlled by government. There’s nothing more cuck then wanting the government to be in charge of your life

based

All I see here is
>I WANT TO POPULATE THE WORLD WITH UNEDUCATED, UNHEALTHY, INJURED PEOPLE WHO CAN'T EVEN WORK BECAUSE OF TH FUCKING KIDS YOU FORCED THEM TO HAVE. THEN, YOU PAY WELFARE, FOOD STAMPS, AND MEDICAID.

So, pick your free shit. You're paying it either way. Maybe don't be such a retarded ideologue and actually look at the problems.

Attached: 1646203514901.jpg (640x640, 97.27K)

>I parse strawman arguments like a beginning programmer

Could you be any more proud of not having a college education?