Why aren't we giving money to and encouraging low IQ individual to go sterile so they don't reproduce...

Why aren't we giving money to and encouraging low IQ individual to go sterile so they don't reproduce? Why is eugenics so frowned upon when it's for the benefit of humanity?

Attached: download.jpg (256x197, 20.65K)

>Calls other people low IQ
>Can't spell the correct plural of individuals

End you life

basically the reverse is being done. money is being poured into getting retards to multiply

I'm guessing you never read War Against The Weak

>when it's for the benefit of humanity?
It's for the benefit of humanity ~in theory~.
You guys act like it's a foregone conclusion that having lots of intelligent, strong, organized, disciplined people will lead to a better future, but it may well just lead to society becoming more broken and insane or dysfunctional.

Hitler tried this shit and it got him axed. "eugenics" is the same as "Anti-Semitism" to the globohomo you faggot OP

Attached: 1647219826539.jpg (699x637, 57.05K)

IQ isn’t inherited, bozo.

That's just retarded to say
While can be occasionally be exceptions, the past is definitely a good predictor of the future when it comes to IQ.

>he fell for the IQ meme

Attached: [SubsPlease] Higurashi no Naku Koro ni Gou - 05 (1080p) [0F1CF549].mkv_snapshot_18.24_[2021.03.06_23.33.44].jpg (784x817, 95.04K)

that's literally what abortion is. blacks, the lowest iq people on earth, get abortions way way more than anyone else. abortion is based.

Attached: 1647648020606.jpg (1444x2048, 173.5K)

>criticizes typo of single letter
>"End you life"

Attached: 349fa657ec1b8f88fda91103cfa49cea.jpg (720x692, 57.9K)

IQ is pseudoscience, that's why

The past is a predictor of culture and economic standing, which is a predictor of IQ.

Everything you've been told about IQ by dickheads like Molyneaux is nothing but self-serving fantasy. The "woke" defense is delusional self-reinforcement and itself not an argument. IQ is not even widely accepted as a measure of human potential.

IQ is a shit-tier reason to do eugenics.
Eugenics should be done for aesthetic purposes only.

Attached: noa.jpg (366x573, 39.59K)

I know this is Any Forums, but you are one giant idiot.
Intellect isn’t inherited. That’s like expecting a couple of illiterate’s children can’t learn to read.

And IQ is a choppy mostly useless way to measure intelligence. But you don’t know that, because you are in fact stupid. A real permanent resident of Any Forums

this thread is pretty good midwit bait, well played OP

Attached: 1645648759240.jpg (966x1365, 1.27M)

Says the pedophile. Har har.

I've been tested at >160 IQ and I am convinced that IQ is not useful at all for measuring intelligence.

it is a compliment
how are you 160 iq and dumber than me lmao

Attached: 3c5e1d792ac0a618cc7ab6ab26327648.jpg (1290x1903, 679.87K)

Eugenics has its place. Eliminating all birth defects and major mental illnesses would ease a lot of pressure on society. Of course that would require abortions and the loudest, most retarded voices in society are against that.

>intelligence isn't heritable
That's why dog breeds all show the same behavioral characteristics and there's no difference in intelligence between them right? They're all equally trainable right?
Hell, even an orangutan and a white man are likely to have the same inherent level of mental capacity since genetic differences regarding intellect don't exist right?
You are a shit eating moron.

Bait

>Of course that would require abortions
you mean Forced abortions? Yeah, everybody who is against the government deciding who should be able to breed is the "most retarded"