There needs to be STRICT RULES to control and ultimately ban animal ownership for ALL dog and cat owners
Special exceptions can be made for food production animals
An outright cruelty ban on all fish, reptiles, hamsters, etc, unless required for a job of some kind, such as antivenom extraction, for HIGHLY experienced and documented trainers, only
A special permanent license, only available to higher income brackets, should be required for all pet animal ownership, with required veterinary care and bare minimum multiple acres of space or more
Nobody should be allowed to own a dog except 500k net worth, or a special permanent license of some kind
only
It can cost 100 grand for either food production, or companion animals, but not both
Chase Reyes
So basically you want to get massive wild cat and dog populations that will quickly starve or be killed in other ways and additionally just straight up kill all fish etc that cant survive in the wild unless shipped to a very specific location? >A special permanent license, only available to higher income brackets, should be required for all pet animal ownership, with required veterinary care and bare minimum multiple acres of space or more This i can sort of see, many animals are being mistreated (but then again many people are also being mistreated and we cant fix that either), but this would be a nightmare to set up and enforce.
Isaac Evans
Pet keeping for non-utility purposes indicates both emotional underdevelopment and anthropomorphic transference. Your cat will eat your face when it finds you dead. The only useful thing about pets is that they can teach young children about the inevitability of death.
Brandon Watson
So we should euthanize them or cut them all loose to be hit by cars. To put a stop to the cruelty. Got it.
Easton Young
>A special permanent license, only available to higher income brackets, should be required for all pet animal ownership, with required veterinary care and bare minimum multiple acres of space or more Guten morgen, kraut.
Zachary Davis
Would be a hell of a lot less than that with this idea
At least, until extinction, finally succeeds.
Why? 100k per licensewill reduce costs, diseases, and animal torture
100k license? so basically less than 1% of the human poplulation would be able to have pets, you want to eliminate 99% of all pet animals. You might think you are on the side of the animals, but you are not, if we want to lessen suffering then why dont we nuke the planet, if nobody/nothing lives then there will be no more suffering.
Liam Miller
You could have multiple animals per 1 permanent license
What is the purpose behind helping animals? What is your endgame here?
Gavin Nguyen
Yeah, I mean it's a multi billion industry it's not going anywhere
Pet industry will make MORE MONEY with this idea, not less. Record low cruelty. What's not to love?
Cooper Bell
So my dog gets regular check ups at the vet, is fed food that he seems to enjoy (judging by how he wolfs it down), has plenty of space in his ENCLOSED garden to piss and shit, is allowed to sleep on my bed, has his own bed, and gets walked twice a day.
He seems pretty happy for an abused dog.
Samuel Jackson
OP just seems to assume one can't care for their pets or make them happy he's just a nigger who's never been loved and is projecting, basically
Aaron Rogers
Nah you'd just need one vet appointment at time of licensing I guess.
Only 100k and up fee, with more added on.
It depends, you give him euthanized puppies to eat then laugh at it?
That's basically what normie cucks expect their dog to eat anyway
Fuck it just ban it
Mason Baker
>hamsters >antivenom
Hudson Carter
it's dangerous to go alone here, take this
Oliver Rogers
If ending suffering is your goal then this is no the place where that happens. Go out there and start killing animals, that is the only way to stop them from making more animals that will also suffer.
Josiah Anderson
See this wouldn't be a problem if the nigs didn't breed Pitbulls 24/7 and then realize that their government checks weren't enough to take care of it.
