Do you think casual violence will ever be socially acceptable again. Like sure it still happens but the very notion that you would choose violence over talk is considered reprehensible. Do you think we'll ever go back to violence being used as a badge of honor and shit. Where we actually fight wars instead of endlessly cuckold the population with" eeeeeeh well throw them some sanctions and call it a day wouldn't want to over reach"
When can we be proud of strength again
Yes and no. Wars are simply not economical, and I have a hard time thinking of a case where we could enjoy the same quality of life.
That said, who the fuck needs war to enact violence, or have strength associated with honor? Why, the weak and stupid hate the police for a reason.
As if culture and government ever cared about what's economical or the quality of life.
They care just enough to line their own pockets, friend. *Their* quality of life would be affected. And if the ones in power sure do not want one thing it is that. But maybe I was a little harsh. Wars are not exactly out of season. Modern wars are merely not fought in a way that involve the actual countries. It's proxy wars, which comes with the added benefit of selling weapons while producing fewer cripples in your own country.
more is coming dude. this has been memed for years and all this talk about "chemical attack" is going to evolve. we're in for some shit and the royal bankers will sit back and laugh as they pull the strings
i fucking hope it will be. so many fucking freaks parade around in the streets prancing around talking about pride in being a fucking degenerate, like fuck man imagine how much better shit would be if a little queer fucker started trying to expose his faggot lifestyle to children so real men beat the motherfucker into the ground.
>like fuck man imagine how much better shit would be if a little queer fucker started trying to expose his faggot lifestyle to children
yeah nah pretty sure even faggots would throw those people in the tranny pits with the rape hons.
Ganging up on a weaker person is the opposite of manly.
The internet is the reason wars dont escalate anymore, unfortunately. Take out the internet and we could have WW3
when combating evil does being manly or being ethical in treatment to them matter?
Evil is subjective. But, it does seem like it's considered 'strong' to disable an opponent in any backhanded way possible now.
Of course it does. That's why we have ethical standards and definitions of masculinity in the first place.
What are those? If they piss you off, germ and chemical warfare until they go away?
People are scared to even call others men or women anymore and anything considered traditionally masculine has been under attack for at least a decade
I wouldn’t bother with thinking standards are gonna matter for something people clearly hate so much these days
More than a decade, and the attack is severe. Systemic.
So, what is answer?
Society descends into chaos.
Probably, as we just saw in the Ukraine, standards in terms of how men are supposed to be the ones whose die are going to magically reappear at the last minute but that’s the only one
Then a bunch of men will die, then everybody else will
>manly
that's literally not true
manly is not being afraid of exerting your will
Great option... Amazing option.
But, do you think that's worse than what's happening to men, now?
In a fair and balanced fight.
Being a man, being 'alpha' certainly isn't sneaking behind someone, setting them up, back stabbing them, etc. I don't know if fighting to the death is the best way to resolve things, but what's happening now - for sure - isn't any better.
being a man is standing up for what you believe in, not backing down, and getting shit done Any Means Necessary
Then you have the germ warfare, and doctors to give them crazy pills and shuffle them off into a room somewhere. These things aren't really good for a society. The new Darwin - victory of the slimiest?
I disagree with that. If you don't believe in honor, you don't believe in anything.
That’s right
Even if you have to pop some pills and change your name so you can start beating the women to get your medal
That's true up until the "any means necessary" part. Bombing children in Syria gets the job done but it certainly isn't manly.
I'm in this conversation not thinking about war, but normal society, but you make the same point very well.
if killing syrian children is what it takes to make shit better for me and people i care about so be it, however i think youre a cowardly rat if you arent upfront about what your doing and the motives for doing it, despite how bad that shit is i wouldnt hide it or be ashamed of what i had to do
A lot of cowardly rats out there in open society. They're running the show out here.
>In a fair and balanced fight.
Why?
So that if you loose you can claim it was because your opponent was fighting unfairly?
The strong have no idea of how it feels to fight against undoubtedly stronger opponent, they enforce rules to limit themselves to enforce their own sense of superiority.
Learn some humility and stab his balls.