If there was a very realistic seeming simulator game where you could rape her while she cries, screams and struggles; would you play it?
She wouldn't get traumatized or anything or even feel anything at all because she's fake. A simulation.
It would feel like a very tight hole wrapped around your dick though.
She's fucking 2 years old, you degenerate. Kill yourself.
She isn't anything. She's not real dude.
doesn't change the fact that she is a depiction of a 2 year old child, a fucking baby.
Actually it does change the fact. When you kill someone on grand theft auto do you feel bad about it?
no, there is a clear difference.
If i watched drawn pictures of gay men fucking eachother, I would be a gay faggot. You would assume that i am attracted to men.
If degenerates like you fap to drawn children, I would assume that you are a pedophile who is attracted to kids. Now get off Any Forums and hang yourself.
No. That creature is ugly and im not into misery.
Pure suffering is a massive turn off even if its only simulated.
>I would assume that you are a pedophile who is attracted to kids
This is the logic I don't understand: the statement is true, yes. If you get off to kids, you're a pedophile. But shouldn't you WANT pedophiles to have access to fictional child pornography that doesn't require the employment of real children for its creation? Otherwise pedophiles don't get to reach catharsis at all, making them more likely to offend against real kids, making those REAL kids less safe. Like how punching a pillow makes you less likely to punch a person.
If you care about kids, you'd assume you'd want pedophiles to consume more animated CP, not less or none.
Its not logic. Its a trained response. Dont confuse an emotional outburst for thought.
no because
a) not into rape
b) not into her face
c) not into toddlers
i won't judge anyone's taste though, as long as the stuff is pure 3d rendering and no human was hurt in the creation