Are lolis really banned in the red areas...

Are lolis really banned in the red areas? I'm calling bullshit because it's a victimless "crime" and it's freedom of expression. But a friend of mine who's into it is looking for a new state to move to. Should I tell him to avoid Virginia and Maryland?

Attached: 218F1427-8739-4621-AE54-F25734B340A2.png (1300x990, 898.25K)

Other urls found in this thread:

law.cornell.edu/supct/html/00-795.ZO.html
law.cornell.edu/supct/html/06-694.ZO.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

banned in canada im pretty sure.
>freedom of expression
its kiddie porn you pedo faggot

>leaf
Thanks for the bump. But your logic is retarded. Are violent action movies murder now too??

Attached: 7BBA31EA-234A-4D50-A2B5-64AF295FA1F4.png (650x650, 12.64K)

kys OP age is just a number and jail is just a place

I guess Any Forums is not a good place to ask anything even remotely serious.
Lolis aren't people. You will never be a woman. Niggers tongue my anus.

Attached: 8A52F9AA-7263-4F0F-AEE4-77F9A94FD72A.jpg (650x650, 124.8K)

violent action movies are Romanticism of those violent acts yes, your point?
lolis is literally drawing children having sex. you cannot argue that. it is drawn CP. OP is a pedo. I hope your kid (not that youll ever reproduce) gets molested , and the molester makes loli porn of your kid, and you jerk off to it. fucking pedo faggot.

Dont care. Doesnt matter.
Shoot anyone that tries to arrest you for seeing something.

No, it's officially illegal in both Canada and the US. The color guide more realistically represents how much the different state and provincial governments care about and enforce that. In general though unless you're moving TBs of loli a day or trafficking in real cp nobody really cares.

you just have a biased opinion and can't make your own opinion by yourself. continue to live being blind.

its an expression of imagination u retarded dumbfuck stop condescending YOUR inability to process fiction with overthinking over mere artform
now go outside and lay in grass youve been here too long

It is illegal on a federal level, but legal in certain places at a state level. Same for pot. But yeah they aren't sending fbi agents out to arrest random people for having a picture of cartoon loli butt

I dont like it so its bad!!!!

Attached: 62699-full.png (471x353, 139.85K)

>me live being blind?
>ME go touch grass??
YOURE LITERALLY DEFENDING PEDOPHILIA. YOU ARE A PEDOPHILE. NOT ONCE HAVE YOU DENIED IT EITHER!

i hope whoever raped you as a kid made you cum, as the only other time you're gonna get fucked is when you're in jail for possession of child porn

>btw Jerome and the other jail niggers HATE pedophiles

Attached: walker-ap-ml-200914_1600094237490_hpEmbed_5x6_992.jpg (826x992, 65.14K)

Loli isnt pedo

Any non-pedophile would disagree.

Attached: 51SEQuhoRKL._AC_.jpg (375x500, 43.13K)

Hell I'm a pedo and even I'll tell you loli is as pedo as it gets.

It's fucking obvious. Why do we keep talking about this?

Loli is in the same level of legality as adult pornography, in that it's legal unless deemed 'obscene', which is done so on a state-by-state, case-by-case basis.

If loli were Federally illegal, then US-based websites like Any Forums, or publishers like Fakku, Steam, or JastUSA wouldn't be allowed to accommodate or publish it and I wouldn't be able to import loads of it on the regular in the form of both loli hentai manga and figurines.

Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition (2002)
law.cornell.edu/supct/html/00-795.ZO.html
By prohibiting child pornography that does not depict an actual child, the statute goes beyond New York v. Ferber, 458 U.S. 747 (1982), which distinguished child pornography from other sexually explicit speech because of the State’s interest in protecting the children exploited by the production process. See id., at 758. As a general rule, pornography can be banned only if obscene, but under Ferber, pornography showing minors can be proscribed whether or not the images are obscene under the definition set forth in Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973). Ferber recognized that “[t]he Miller standard, like all general definitions of what may be banned as obscene, does not reflect the State’s particular and more compelling interest in prosecuting those who promote the sexual exploitation of children.” 458 U.S., at 761.

US v. Williams (2008)
law.cornell.edu/supct/html/06-694.ZO.html
But an offer to provide or request to receive virtual child pornography is not prohibited by the statute. A crime is committed only when the speaker believes or intends the listener to believe that the subject of the proposed transaction depicts real children. It is simply not true that this means “a protected category of expression [will] inevitably be suppressed,” post,at 13. Simulated child pornography will be as available as ever, so long as it is offered and sought as such, and not as real child pornography.

Attached: 20211020_120823.jpg (640x712, 165.62K)

this map is BS, the laws in Canada are all federal, not provincial. it's not more or less legal in any province

>WAHH IF YOU LIKE LOLI YOURE A PEDO
>I HOPE YOUR CHILD GETS RAPED
wtf???

Oh you suddenly dont like the idea of a child being used sexually? Hm? PEDO?
Can you PLEASE deny it just once. Just type the words "I am not a pedophile" to fucking humor me, you pedo faggot

i dont get it, just jerk off to real adult women, it isn't difficult