Fact. C was the first high level language
Fact. Unix is was the first OS written entirely in a high level language
Fact. Both are old as shit and insecure
This leads to the following
Fact. We need to replace C with Rust, and Unix with something better (Windows NT written in Rust maybe?)
Why would you want to make another VMS clone?
At least start from something with a good design like BeOS.
fact. the wheel was the first innivation for transporting goods long distances over land.
fact. the wheel is also old and unstable as shit (you need four of them and also it can't go up stairs???).
we need to replace the wheel with something newer and better (bipedal, or anti-gravity perhaps?)
>replace ... Unix with something better
sure
>Windows NT
ok no. no
Fact: NT is shit
Fact: C is based
Fact: UNIX is based
Fact: You Will Never Be A Woman
...
>C was the first high level language
Hilariously wrong. LISP was the first high level language, by about 20 years
MEGA leaking happening?
get in here
>C was the first high level language
So Fortran and Lisp are not high level?
>Unix with something better
ok. how bout Linux
>tranny ricer OS is based
>calls others trannies
pottery
I still don't get why trannies are so scared of C.
Just learn it and actual code
>Fact. C was the first high level language
False. Fortran was the first one in 1957.
>Fact. Unix is was the first OS written entirely in a high level language
False. Burroughs MCP was the first one, written in ESPOL in 1961.
>Fact. We need to replace C with Rust, and Unix with something better (Windows NT written in Rust maybe?)
Unix should be replaced with a zero-kernel operating system.
You realize that high level language doesn't mean it's good? Actually usually the opposite.
A LISP wizard can get better performance out of LISP than a anyone from C for example.
The benefits are literally all learning and time/money related. Dumber people can do shit quicker for cheaper, all companies care about. Meanwhile performance goes down the toilet.
>rust
>trannies
Oh wait.
>Meanwhile performance goes down the toilet.
>C
Compared to manually optimized ASM or even LISP? Yep.
How fast was Genera compared to UNIX?
Anyone who writes LISP in all caps in 2022 doesn't actually write Lisp.
the only reason you unixtranny faakhead think that NT is bad is because it's attached to the "windows" tumor
pointless question; they ran on entirely separate hardware, but the VAX eventually caught up to the performance of LispMs and they booted up faster since Unix offers basically nothing in comparison to Genera
Probably just a bitter rold boomer mad that the world passed him and that his skills are useless.