So what do the bongs of Any Forums think of the BBC micro
oi mate, love me some speccy, simple as
>bbc micro
That's an oxymoron.
same
Cor blimey, it's just a more expensive Acorn Electron, innit?
Kek
It was a pretty decent computer for its day; solidly built (a must for school use) and had a good range of expansion options. The BASIC was nice, lots of software (you could even add a slave CPU and run CP/M, MS-DOS, OS-9, etc.)
It was just too expensive to be widely used outside of education, which was a shame really. They made a cheaper version (the Electron) for home use, but I've never had the chance to use one for long enough to compare it to its contemporaries.
That reminds me I should probably see if mine still works and replace the RIFA cap before it blows...
That’s a fact!
Blimey crikey O'reilly, innit wally? Bloody good observation matey.
This
He's a cool guy that did the Domesday project and doesn't afraid of Sinclair
>solidly built (a must for school use)
was britian already blessed with black immigrants back then?
>(you could even add a slave CPU and run CP/M, MS-DOS, OS-9, etc.)
Didn't most microcomputers of the time support that?
coalie
Bump for more discussion
agree
technology from the UK is irrelevant
>t. amerimutt
The pi is relevant.
tbp coping
sharty coal