DNS

>fast
>private
>audited
>mozilla approved
>option to enterprise level malware blocking
Why aren't you using it yet?

Attached: Cloudflare-DNS.png (886x260, 46.1K)

Other urls found in this thread:

wiki.mozilla.org/Security/DOH-resolver-policy
mozilla.cloudflare-dns.com/dns-query
digdeeper.neocities.org/ghost/mozilla.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

im gay and i use googles

slow

>>mozilla approved
Not true. Normal 1.1.1.1 is not Mozilla approved. Mozilla's TRR agreement that prevents data from being sold or websites being censored only applies to a designated path
wiki.mozilla.org/Security/DOH-resolver-policy
In Cloudflare's case, that is mozilla.cloudflare-dns.com/dns-query
So if your query isn't going through this path, the mozilla TRR agreement is not in effect

>glowing honeypot

I use adguard on mobile and quad9 elsewhere

>trusting a dns service owned by london police

>>mozilla approved
that is a good thing for you?

Attached: lol.png (1390x684, 473.93K)

>Linus mentions it
>suddenly there are shill threads
Really makes you think

>all this fud
I have clearly made the right choice

Attached: 1655335043500.jpg (1077x1750, 430.16K)

At my last job before I got into actual software dev (we did the digital signage players for fast food places, etc), we shipped out a lot of devices to restaurants.

A lot of the firewall vendors would block 1.1.1.1 DNS but not the 8.8.8.8 google DNS, but it wasn't known when they were imaged. So when the lower tier reps were on the phone speaking with a Burger King, etc about a device that would stop receiving updates,
I would have to ssh in and change the DNS with vi or something like that. They had no consistency at all, unlike Mcdonalds / T-Bell that had a standard way of doing things.

>>mozilla approved
That's how you know it glows.
digdeeper.neocities.org/ghost/mozilla.html

I ran DNS benchmark and the default one my isp uses was the best.

>I have clearly made the right choice
Cope. The right choice is running your own server.

That great, but all the ISP ones block piracy and news here

this is literally the exact policy every police department has. they don't want some inferior department seeing the bathroom schedules they have recorded from every UK citizen.

>A lot of the firewall vendors would block 1.1.1.1 DNS
Is there a reason why?

I have adguard home what do I care

I don't know what else I'd be using.

i use dns.watch for years now

>botnet
>botnet
>botnet
>botnet
>botnet
Botnet botnet botnet. Botnet!

>his DNS doesn't reference aluminum foil hats

Attached: file.png (132x111, 1.2K)

I don't really know why, they had a couple firewall providers that did this, Trustwave was one of them. I guess they don't like Cloudflare maybe?
My old job was very boring though, and I liked when that kind of stuff happened because I was the only one that could fix it.

>dns
>blocks malware
that's not how this works dummy

It can block known domains providing malware.
Obviously it isn't scanning loli.jpg.exe that you downloaded

this is pretty based

They have totally clear servers too

kek what a braindead post
as expected from a nigger who doesn't even have his own domain

I hate anyone and everyone related with computers in general

basta

>no argument
glow harder