Two CEOs on a podcast casually proposed a shareable database of worker performance that would follow them between companies, forever, and encouraged listeners to create one. HR professionals say it's a terrible idea.
How based would this be? You could screen out all the poor job performers, leecchers who spend their time browsing Any Forums and reddit instead of working, sexual assaulters, etc.
Fuck american tech companies, and also death to american federal government.
Adam Gomez
I would have no problem with this as long as the record isn't permanent (say data is only kept for ~10 years).
Mason Adams
Yes it’s based but not in the way you want it to be
Levi Rogers
Niggers would be jobless eternally and people would have to provide them gibs forever. Its a bad idea
Zachary Lopez
Good, diversity quotas needs to go. People should be judged based on merit not race
Cooper Murphy
>How based would this be? You could screen out all the poor job performers, leecchers who spend their time browsing Any Forums and reddit instead of working, sexual assaulters, etc.
It would just be used to deny white men jobs, while putting incompetent dindus, pajeets, and women in their place.
Daniel Gutierrez
>Good, diversity quotas needs to go. People should be judged based on merit not race
You actually think that's what would happen here? LOL If anything this will reinforce their quotas because white men won't even get interviews.
Alexander Campbell
it's currently defacto illegal in the US, if not explicitly, to do such a thing. good luck getting workers to agree to it
Alexander Foster
Wow
Lincoln Ross
They can suck my cock Who gives a fuck what these niggas want
Brayden Thomas
>putting your career at the whim of some hr retard
Angel Collins
Interesting
Joshua Gutierrez
>Stop diversity quotas >white women stop getting hired and their positions go to the 1000th pajeet or chink
Remember when they removed diversity admissions in Universities and it got flooded by chinks? Same thing for the work force.
It's private, so that means it would be permenant.
Owen Harris
It's only going to be used to filter out people convicted of wrongthink. They can easily look and see if they're a nigger/woman/tranny or if their name ends in -berg, -stein, -blatt, etc but they can't tell just by looking at you if you're a good White goy or a bad one when they actually need to get some work done. This is just to further the un-employing of White non-bugmen.
Who fills in the permanent performance report? What if your previous employer didn't like you and left a poor review out of spite?
Oliver Thompson
Don't know about illegal, but I can imagine anyone in HR or Legal seeing this, thinking of all the potential for lawsuits, and just standing there screaming into the void.
Logan Butler
right, defacto due to lawfare culture but also some states have specific protections against exactly this kind of employment data sharing. Apple and Google lost a class action a few years ago for anticompetitive hiring practices sorta related to this
Dominic Ramirez
As soon as those two jackass CEOs do it for themselves.
Owen Peterson
let's add wage and employer too. make it freely available so the employees can see they're underpaid. then we have enough data to add compensation by productivity rating at each job category so people can see what employers don't reward work.