These functions make Reddit programmers shit their pants. They’re not “safe” enough lmao
These functions make Reddit programmers shit their pants. They’re not “safe” enough lmao
Jose Diaz
Other urls found in this thread:
Noah Sanchez
Whenever i use calloc it gives me index out of bounds, so i switch to malloc and use a for loop to initialize, and everything works
Aiden Gonzalez
>another "i just lost an argument with a Rust user and need to cope hard" thread
Nathaniel Sanders
OP its not about being safe, its about a large project having a memory issue due to human error which is going to only be evident on runtime it doesnt matter if you have 10 million hours with C/C++ people make mistakes.
Landon Rodriguez
It's been good enough for the most important operating systems / software for half a century - just admit you're a shit programmer.
Carson Jones
I am assuming its just poor bait at this point but i will still answer you. There have a been a plethora of vulnerability exploits in Windows over the years due to human errors.
Andrew Thompson
int main() {
int* nigger = malloc(-1);
return;
}
Mason Jenkins
>projecting
William Peterson
(((((((((human))))))))) error
Justin Rogers
You mean the operating systems with hundreds of CVEs?
Ryder Gray
Why is there no "recalloc"? Why does C++ has no calloc? This shit pisses me off.
Jeremiah Green
c++ has vector, why would it need calloc?
Joseph Adams
Why is it always the same illiterate village idiot rescuing these crap threads from page 11?
Jaxon Nelson
boo hoo
Josiah Foster
>Why is there no "recalloc"?
There'd be little point to it. Particularly considering realloc copies over the bytes from the previous allocation.
>Why does C++ has no calloc?
You can force operator new to call the default constructor on integers if need be.
stackoverflow.com
Jace Stewart
necroniggers are part of the chaos in the machine
Christian Stewart
noo not free()
Anthony Ross
Java virtual machine allocates mem and garbage collects it for me. Seethe more tinkertranny.
Aaron Watson
Leftist programming paradigm is to restrict your freedom.
Xavier Gonzalez
how do you use calloc? also dont use a for loop for initializing to 0, use memset
David Myers
why not just call the c functions? also of you want "new" to 0 init your allocated memory, add brackets at the end like so "new type[amount]{}". now it will be 0 init