What broadband speed do you consider "fast"?

What broadband speed do you consider "fast"?

Attached: 1655117529601.jpg (1100x2140, 288.24K)

Where's the bulge?

1Gbps up/down. That's what I have and I consider it more than enough.

Built for BBC

100/100mbps should be enough for most in current day. 1gbps is fast.

100/100 is "enough". 1000/1000 is fast. Most NICs can't handle more than that anyway.

Unironically many med to high end mobos and prebuilds come with at least 2.5Gbps now. I'd say in a few years it will be "most" if not already, as far as new shit goes.

go eat one yourself

Yeah, I know, I have a Realtek RTL8125B. I've heard the new 2.5G Intel NICs have a lot of issues, and I don't know how well Realtek's alternative can handle a sustained throughput of 2.5Gbps (many of their gigabit NICs could only sustain ~600-700 Mbps).

Where's her penis?

50+ mbit internet.
1Gbit+ intranet.

Tucked away safely.

>1996. 28.8k modem, ~3-4kb/s
>1997. ISDN. 8kb/s
>1999. Go to LAN party and blow my mind downloading at 35kb/s
>...
>2015. Have to throw out my 100MBit switch because my downstream is faster
>2022. Get annoyed and pick a different mirror because the download dropped below 10MB/s

kys

Kuki, my wife, is very cute and I love her very much :3

10gigabit is standard here
fast would be anything about that
>all these third worlders itt

Your wife is hot :)

Cookiebros I still need to farm spectres...

spbp
Anything below at least symmetrical gigabit isn't fast. If we're talking about your home network I'd say at least 40G.

I currently use ~15 Mbps so 30 is probably a lot for me
t. have never seen download speeds greater than 1.5 MiB/s

my internet usually goes at 500kbps, but it can go up to 2mbps

>Mask
I'm only going to engage in this thread with the only purpose of shitting it.

I'm stealing this one