How do you guys even query lists in your preferred programming languages? Does your language really not have stuff like LINQ which allows you to query lists for multiple conditions and create a totally new list?
How Do People Deal Without LINQ?
Oliver Ortiz
Other urls found in this thread:
techempower.com
twitter.com
Aiden Johnson
In proper languages we call it UFCS, pajeet.
Charles Hill
It's slow as fuck.
Nathan Ortiz
Slower than what? Create a C# program with LINQ code everywhere and it will only be second to Rust and C++
Owen Hall
Real languages like F# don't need such things.
Dominic Cox
No it's not
Luis Hall
Right. Need that optimal fizzbuzz performance you fat NEET fuck.
Noah Richardson
Where's your benchmark? The tradeoff of LINQ has always been speed.
Eli Scott
In Rust, we just use iterators. Seems to work just fine.
Kevin Thomas
Then even node will be faster. Unless something changed since 2019.
Jason Richardson
vendorQuery = sortOn companyName . filter ((`elem` "Toy") . companyName) $ vendors
Bentley Scott
They work great, not like that crap LINQ they talking about.
Isaiah Ward
LINQ is ubiquitous in the dotnet world. Its a standard. It used to represent a noticeable performance loss but a lot of things changed this last decade. Even EF Core got close to the performance of ADO.NET and can be as performant as your raw SQL Queries if used correctly.
In the TechEmpower benchmarks, regardless of the month or the iteration, dotnet apps will always rank just behind C++ and C
techempower.com
Jayden Reyes
Node is at least 20x slower than a very average asp.net core program that uses LINQ and EF Core.
Cooper Smith
>just behind C++ and Rust*
Carter Taylor
>it will only be second to Rust
This is embarrassing, though.
Brayden Phillips
Trolling and coping this much
Nolan Robinson
Not when you get the productivity and ease of use of interpreted languages with that level of performance. Creating and deploying a full featured ASP.NET solution today is most likely faster than doing the same in Django. With Rust you're the least productive you could ever be and the language is not convenient to use at all.
Xavier Young
Oh well, I thought that C# had dropped the Java mentality of "we only need to be slightly faster than Python".
Jace Edwards
It's actually 44x times faster than Python. They're closing the gap with Rust and dotnet 6 processes queries and computation faster than Go.
William Thomas
Modern C# is not that much behind Rust in performance. The 5ms performance advantage your Rust program will get useless. The real difference is in productivity and convenience. Using C# feels like cheating while using Rust feels like being punished. You move slow, there is no such thing as convenience and you're less productive than with C++. The real advantage of C# is that it manages to get system level performance with Python levels of productivity.
Lucas Perry
>How Do People Deal Without LINQ?
They write code the traditional way. Personally I think LINQ is great for database queries but not much for anything else.
Brody Ramirez
Hard to beat Rust when it has no runtime GC and the memory is managed at the compile time.