Why can't America keep its nose out of everyone's business?

Why can't America keep its nose out of everyone's business?

Attached: ukraine-russia-war.jpg (2048x1152, 268.75K)

the shit is habitual

this has very little to do with america on a fundamental level.

I just watched Putin's video. He goes on about Ukraine being tyrannical. And they're only attacking military targets. Wouldn't this be justified in a western country?

>America
>the only country actively trying to prevent war

no, just because putin says they are tyrannical doesn't make it true dumbass

>weapons of mass destruction
Retard

you can't really take putin at his word. you have to remember he's a dictator and when he gives his address he's addressing the russian public and the armed forces as well as the west, so he's skewing information for his own public.

"Russia assumed obligations to repay the entire Soviet debt in return for the newly independent states giving up part of their foreign assets. In 1994, such agreements were reached with Ukraine, but they were not ratified by Ukraine...

"(Ukraine) preferred to act in such a way that in relations with Russia they had all the rights and advantages, but did not bear any obligations...

"From the very first steps they began to build their statehood on the denial of everything that unites us. They tried to distort the consciousness, the historical memory of millions of people, entire generations living in Ukraine."

"Many European allies of the United States already perfectly understood all the risks of such a prospect, but were forced to come to terms with the will of their senior partner. The Americans simply used them to carry out a pronounced anti-Russian policy. A number of member states of the alliance are still very skeptical about the appearance of Ukraine in NATO. At the same time, we are receiving a signal from some European capitals, saying what are you worried about, this will not happen literally tomorrow. Yes, in fact, our American partners are also talking about this. Well, we answer, if not tomorrow, so the day after tomorrow. What does this change in a historical perspective? Basically, nothing. Moreover, we know the position and words of the U.S. leadership that active hostilities in eastern Ukraine do not exclude the possibility of this country joining NATO if it can meet the criteria of the North Atlantic alliance and defeat corruption. At the same time, they try to convince us over and over again that NATO is a peace-loving and purely defensive alliance, saying that there are no threats to Russia. Again they propose that we take them at their word. But we know the real value of such words.