Dall e

>ai fags killing off artfags, one of the few groups of people who have meaningful careers
why did we allow dall-e to exist again

Attached: 2345235647357.jpg (680x680, 77.01K)

ai cannot be original though

Everything is a combination of other things, AI has the potential to be more original than any human because it can draw from the entire documented history of visual data. Data is gold and we gave it to them for free.

Art is not a meaningful career its a hobby.

>one third of artfags see AI as a huge productivity booster / imagination help
>the rest hysterically screech how it's a scam and doesn't even work and will never replace them
Mmmm. I'm trying to leverage this shit to create graphics for stuff before the knowledge becomes mainstream.

New "art" it's just furry porn and rgb shit

>art
>meaningful career
You can only choose one

t. normie who can only consume useless shit and do things other tell him

Artists are the few main characters on this planet.

you're an imbecile. You're seething that people can earn money with their hobby while you work a soul draining job

Lmfao at buttmad artfags ITT can't wait for robots to replace you
The second these algos can generate a fursona in sexual positions your market value is nil

Get off of my board artfag

T. data scientist

Won't stop people from thinking neural network generated images aren't more valuable than anything a person can draw. They're more "pure" "inclusive" and "unbiased". There's no guilt in the images because there's no one to blame.

I think we're going to see it becoming normal to "check your ideas against the computer" because "the computer is always right". Even if the images aren't used directly, it'll still kill off independent thought.

This. Dall-e and other art AI will ultimately filter newer low skill artists, but people (and the AI) will still hunger for original works. The AI will get to a point that it'll be able to amalgamate just about anything you ask of it though so the bar will keep getting higher until we get to a place where only the very best artists are adding anything to the game and the AI will thusly incorporate it in an endless climb up the chaos ladder until someone falls off.

I'll give you that being an artist can be meaningful but most of them don't have much of a career even without AI.

>people ITT that don't realize technologies like this will only make meaningful art created by a real human only more valuable
and the good thing is the new market will filter garbage artists, something that's been needed for a long time, hell, I think AI will clean a lot of bullshit jobs out there

when lawyers/judges/politicians?
I want them replaced the most.

>getting filtered by a robot
lmaaaaooo, /beg/s are going to seethe. NGMI

can it generate normal maps

we dont need artists honestly and anyone who values some chink scribble should reconsider their priorities

Politics and law are completely about human judgement and subjectivity. Law especially, ironically.
You're going to need a total restructuring of society and culture for that to get people on board with a robot dictator and actually consistent law enforcement, better get to work.

The people that really need to be wary about losing their jobs are instagram models. Even the gimped dalle mini already produces pretty solid tits and ass pics.

>drawing a raccoon in a space suit is meaningful

Retard alert!

This. People pretend it's some enlightened special snowflake process. It isn't. Art is a trade.

Attached: 1654781117833.png (633x851, 474.04K)

Nope.
SeeAnd

Sooner than we think, I think. I can see the infrastructure being laid for their replacement under our very eyes. There are bots that can analyze and pull past cases relevant to a present case to use to persuade a judge or jury. For politics, the systems for decentralized governance are being highly stressed and tested at this very moment (governance blockchains). Now, judges, that's one I think requires the human element the most unfortunately unless we go full retard and utilize the power of mass human consensus on cases and we don't want to utilize the stupidity of humanity on certain topics.

a good part of visual 'originality' is just the purposeful combination of existing data, like combining contrasting idea spaces, design languages and so on to make something that hits a 'sweet spot' you know exists, finding new visual niches, so to speak. Another aspect is the exploration of style itself, different brush- and linework, experimenting with color and light, contrast, edges and so on.
The thing you have to understand is that it takes legit genius to be on the cutting edge and actually be producing something new, and then if you're successful probably that becomes 'your style' and you support yourself by giving people that one new thing that you've added to the world of visual arts in different variations while you search for more potential.
In short, creativity, innovation, is only a tiny part of what artists do, and it's not sustainable by itself. Mostly we just iterate the same tasks over and over again. And this is especially true for mainstream commercial illustrators, artists who produce game assets and the like - they're more craftsmen than creatives, and their work can absolutely be automated.

Attached: prealpha.png (1534x1440, 857.94K)