Why are many fortune 500 companies and startups are ditching Go for C#.
Why Are People Leaving Go Lang For C#?
Jordan Brown
Other urls found in this thread:
stackoverflow.com
twitter.com
Sebastian Morgan
We had this thread yesterday and it was just as dumb. MS marketing get out.
Cameron Lewis
Because one is dumbed down enough so that a nigger could use it and the other is (((minimalistic))). One is like coding in scratch and the other makes you do everything from scratch. Companies want to push features fast, and Go isn't good enough for that.
Daniel King
C# bros... we won
Nolan Scott
Probably because so that they don't have to compete with FAANG and startups for those l33t Go h4x0rz when they want codemonkeys.
Bentley Gomez
Because C# is genuinely better.
Christopher Evans
Go is for writing console programs and malwares. C# is for creating marketable software that gets shipped to a customer.
Kayden Roberts
>there is no tuple type in the Go language
the fuck?
Sebastian Brooks
>there are 8 Tuple types in C#
the fuck?
Sebastian Nelson
because chashtag ecosystem is rock solid and now works on linouks without the mono garbage
Jaxon King
The Go philosophy was proven to be shit by test. Tuples can potentially be a useful feature but in most cases you won't use it. But it's there. Java and C# offer you thousands of features and built-in methods to tackle all your potential needs. If you don't use them they don't factor into the equation. If you need them, at least you don't have to reinvent the wheel. Go believes that reimplementing the most basic things is a good thing. Tons of boilerplate for nothing. Time waste and cruel lack of built in methods/functions. It's just a waste of energy and resources.
Easton Young
>FAANG
we call them FAGMAN in these parts
Isaac Martin
Yes, tuples/tuple.create are a great way to quickly check the expressive power of a language.
C# has 8 tuple types, Haskell has 64 tuple types, C++ has one template, Rust has one macro.
Grayson Lee
Imagine a language designer who decides to build something without Generics fuck HOW? And they needed to be reminded time and time again to add them.
Nicholas Flores
Go is not OOP. Thats the fatal flaw
Jason Lee
>C#
A language made to bring more programmers in the Microsoft ecosystem: suitable for static websites just as well as for gamedev, incredible flexibility with shit like LINQ, there's official libraries for everything and the kitchen sink.
>Go
A language made as a crutch for Pajeets, so that they may wageslave somewhat competently and rewrite internal Google tools without making too many mistakes: no flexibility, no libraries, no use case outside the specific one it was created for.
James Hill
I don't think that's the fatal flaw like you say. One thing that helped C# a lot is the way how it decided not to be a strongly opinionated OO language and kept introducing new FP features at each release. Multiparadigm languages are the future.
Liam Fisher
>suitable for static websites
I think you meant dynamic sites (html/css is enough for static ones)
Chase Gomez
stop making this stupid fucking thread
Caleb Mitchell
>Rust has one macro
which doesn't work for all the tools related to tuples
stackoverflow.com
James Morris
Rust is good.
Thomas Russell
I didn't want to include MS specifically, since obviously they don't shun C#.
Caleb Bell
>shun
What does that mean?
Liam Bailey
So what?
You can have anonymous structs in Go which is like 1 keyword more than C# tuples.
Additionally it has multiple return values, which is kind of the main uses of tuples