Web 1.0:
>Decentralized, wildwest
>Used to exchange information and share knowledge
>Every person on the Internet had their own website
Web 2.0:
>Curated, centralized, government approved Internet
>Used to maximize ad revenue, consumer spending and improve government surveillance
>Internet dominated by a few big players
>People no longer have a website on the Internet, they are just another profile in a larger website
What will web 3.0 trend towards? Will we become even more centralized?
Other urls found in this thread:
urbit.org
twitter.com
Web 3.0 is the programmable serverless web.
Web 1.0 was static pages
Web 2.0 was interactive server-backed services
Web 3.0 is (re)programmable distributed and serverless
Examples include IPFS, smart contracts, etc.
Bump
Even more centralized and government regulated. There will basically be 10 services you can use.
the only web3 project that I like is urbit, but I don't like how it used the etherum blockchain. Web3 will be basically techno-feudalism, which is pretty bad
>What will web 3.0 trend towards?
An interesting concept that's popping up recently is "federated" websites. That is, websites that are separately owned and hosted but built to share a common login, to improve user convenience. This allows different site owners to have full control over their sites and not be censored by a big authority, but while still allowing users to use all their websites as if they were owned by one big company.
I hope this is the case. Everything else posted would suck.
>it's another retard doesn't realize web 2.0 started in the 90s thread
>Used to exchange information and share knowledge
Web 2.0 is unarguably better for this purpose, because it's what brought about web based forums and all other discussion, file hosting, etc. to the scene that didn't involve emailing the webmaster so they could add your post or whatever to their site.
"Web 3.0" is a meme marketing term that will be used time and time again to push random bullshit as the next big thing. There will never be a "web 4.0", because that would require settling on whatever meme technology to call "web 3.0" rather than continuing to drag out the term for marketing use. The original web 3.0 was just formatting and tagging to make information on the web better processable by a computer for searches and whatnot.
>The original web 3.0 was just formatting and tagging to make information on the web better processable by a computer for searches and whatnot
semantic web
>web 3.0 is techno feudalism
Isn't that 2.0?