RX 6400

Hi it's user from yesterday again, this card is actually good. It runs everything maxed out at 1080p 60fps and consumes less power, half the power than my last card. The other user calling it a GT 1030 equivalent deserves the rope.

Attached: 44b1f1ae-612f-44d8-8fda-a107c720cc41.jpg (500x500, 39.73K)

Its faster than a 1050ti, just a few points behind a 1650. Anyone comparing it to a GT 1030 is clinically retarded or a lying shill.

is like an rx590 if you use pciegen4
still no hardware encode and only 2 monitor outputs ruined it for me.

...

My CPU does the encoding/decoding anyway and again I run virtual desktops on one screen.

unrelated but will gpu prices become actually not retarded again? or will we never see that again?

Any Forums is full of manchildren
go back to

go back to >>>/reddit/
people are allowed hobbies schitzo

Attached: Capture.png (533x270, 20.13K)

>pciegen4
how many lanes does the card support? My mobo is pcie3

>Its faster than a 1050ti

The words you're looking for are "its performance is all over the place and can be faster in select titles under ideal hardware configurations".

Attached: 2022-05-31 04_11_22-Tiny RDNA2, The Best LP Single Slot GPU_ AMD Radeon RX 6400 Review - YouTube and.png (1318x740, 525.86K)

>It runs everything maxed out at 1080p 60fps

lmao no it doesnt

its decent but i wouldnt feel comfortable paying more than 140 eur for it

There's a 50% difference between 1050ti and 1650.

There's 1.5 whole segment in there, called 1060-3GB and 1060-6GB.

1060-3GB is 35% faster than 1050ti.
1060-6GB is 45%faster than 1050ti.

1030 is 70-80% weaker than 1060 3GB.

>It runs everything maxed out at 1080p 60fps
Everything meaning CSGO and LoL?

Hold the fuck up, does that mean the 1650 is better than a 1060 6GB? Is it only the DDR6 model or even the DDR5 1650 outperforms it?

Whoops I misread that as 1660.

1650 (the gddr6 model )is equivalent to 1060 3gb. a 1060 6gb shits on a 1650.

It does for most games, because there's very few new games that are worth playing.

right. you should have just bought a ps2 for 20 dollars and installed fmcb on it in that case though.

No, what YOU mean, my Indian friend, is "it can be very occasionally slower than a 1050 Ti in select titles with less than ideal hardware configurations". That's why you cherrypicked a single non-representative game for your post, despite the video you took it from providing average performance metrics.

Attached: 6400.png (1280x720, 249.92K)

Testy, testy. It doesn't beat a 1050ti outright. Calling it faster without asterisks is wrong. You can't say that it's non representative just because it loses. It perfectly represents what happens when it hits the pcie bottleneck. My money is on that being more frequent going forward not less.

>It doesn't beat a 1050ti outright
>literally replying to a post of benchmarks beating the 1050ti outright
Brain damage

The guy saying a 1050ti is better should neck himself. What a disinfowarefare loving tranny nigger.