Ayyy this nigger for real or what????
Ayyy this nigger for real or what????
Colton Martin
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
twitter.com
Wyatt Diaz
Yes. Also the idea that anyone with good intentions can or will audit Linux is a joke. Almost all of the work on it is done by corporations who have the worst intentions in mind and the project is so big only they have the manpower to properly audit it
Luke Sullivan
>binary blobs
Debian GNU/Linux does not have this problem.
Michael White
How will Linuxtards ever recover from this???
Luis Hill
He's a narcissistic autist.
Anyone can compile linux from source... No binary blobs from Linus are needed.
Benjamin Stewart
Respond and ask him what the filename of said blob is on disk so he can dodge the question.
Christopher Thomas
>a binary blob from Linus Torvalds built into EVERY release that ONLY he has the source code for
Linusbros...? Did we get too cocky?
Daniel Murphy
>a binary blob from Linus Torvalds built into EVERY release that ONLY he has the source code for
Isn't this technically true of all GPG-signed software?
You can't audit a foss dev's private key
Evan Sanchez
no, signing a tarball doesn't stop you from access the contents, all it does is prevent you from modifying the contents and passing it off as original
it's why it's called signing and not encryption
Ethan Murphy
Yeah, but there's still a resource you don't have access to that was used to create the tarball
Levi Gomez
no, only the signature can't be created by anybody else, it's a separate file and doesn't change the tarball file at all
you could create the tarball yourself, provided you use the same files you could generate the exact same file, which will also pass the signature verification
Oliver Parker
There is plenty of resources you don't have access to e.g. the rice config files of a contributor.
However if this is just about encrypting an archive, then no blob is in the archive.
Julian Gomez
LFS is the premiere GNU+Linux experience.
William Morales
>a binary blob built into every release that only he has the source code for
This is obviously a very jewy way to refer to the detached gpg signature.
Josiah Hernandez
yeah that's disinformation
Christopher Barnes
He's being for real, but he's also retarded, so what he's saying is objectively incorrect.
See:
Benjamin Garcia
>doesnt work at microsoft anymore
>still cucked for bill gates
this must be the power of autism
Colton James
Any Forums is going to correct him on that and make him apologize, right?
Daniel Sanders
link to comment youtube.com
Ryder Sanchez
even if it was true and there was a binary blob of actual code, his point is still retarded, because it's one closed source file vs thousands of closed source files that make up the entire OS. how the fuck is he this stupid?
Bentley Rogers
Holy shit, the comments are shredding him lol.
It reminds me of those kids that would mindlessly repeat fake video game rumors on the playground getting shredded by the one kid with a modem and a printer.
Andrew Gonzalez
/thread
Jayden Harris
He probably owns Microsoft stock.