Welp

Welp

Attached: RHEL9.png (721x253, 46.87K)

because making people like you seethe alone is already worth it

>the enormity of this endeavor
Illiterate or secretly based?

Yes, because now they don't have to feel uncomfortable saying slave in front of their black coworkers.

Non techie here, wouldn't that be easy as fuck anyway? Ctrl F, replace Slave with Nigger or something and press save?

I HAVE FOUR WORDS FOR YOU

Attached: 1631752986024.gif (320x240, 163.77K)

Home setups? Sure.
Enterprise setups? It causes more work than needed because some faggot got buttflustered

time to switch to slaveowner, nigger, niggerlist and allowlist.

Why do people give a shit about these things

the alternative would be to be productive

so intellectually bankrupt blue checkmarks on twitter can demonstrate how progressive they are, while they type away on their chinese made device, assembled by actual slaves. these people are the dumbest baboons in existence.

>Let's dub a race of people by the color of their skin
>The problematic term is the color code itself, not the racial one

Attached: smirk.jpg (523x523, 28.6K)

No, because what you replace with them is contextual.
Honestly, replacing the words "master and slave" is good. It's a retarded and imprecise term, which makes little sense in 90% of contexts.
On the other hand, replacing blacklist and whitelist makes absolutely no sense, since these things have nothing to do with race. I guess americans will soon declare that saying black is racist too.

Can't have that
I'm talking about both people who want to change them and people being mad about it on Any Forums. Like, who cares if it's not changed and who cares if they change it

I for one oppose the use of the highly offensive word "git"

Attached: git-definition.png (304x142, 13.06K)

>Honestly, replacing the words "master and slave" is good. It's a retarded and imprecise term, which makes little sense in 90% of contexts.
Elaborate

>Red Hat

Yikes, are they insinuating something about Native Americans, who had had their land stolen, that they have a certain value on the hacker-hat spectrum? That's like, totally problematic.

Attached: limmy.png (300x300, 77.32K)

Zoomers and millenials are literally shitting and pissing their pants because software uses these terms. Whole world is fucked.

>beginning with
Give an inch, take a mile. EVERY. SINGLE. TIME.

No, a very tiny % of people, all mentally ill, are.

>Like, who cares if it's not changed and who cares if they change it
the problem with it is the motivation behind it, and since it was nothing more than politicized posturing by attention whores and imposed on some people without any choice, then it should come as no surprise to anyone why some are vocal about it.

>who cares if it's not changed and who cares if they change it
Kill yourself.

Attached: dindunuffin.png (410x197, 52.06K)

It's just a different term, it's literally nothing imo

Y'all give too much of a shit about this stuff.

if it's literally nothing then why change it in the first place

NIGGERS
TONGUE
MY
ANUS

you work in the software industry for 30 years and this shit just gets ingrained in you. Now if you dare say "blacklist" you're put on a fucking PIP from the higherups and they get your unwoke ass out of there

>Honestly, replacing the words "master and slave" is good. It's a retarded and imprecise term, which makes little sense in 90% of contexts.
You are a literal fucking retard. The master/slave paradigm was used because it perfectly encapsulates the relationship between interdependent pieces of hardware and/or software.

It hurts the sensibilities of "people" who think it could, possibly, theoretically hurt the sensibilities of certain groups they generally are not a part of.

then it is not 'nothing'

I'm sure niggers care about this change.