Google is 0.00000000000000000000000000000000001% of the actual internet.
I can prove this to you. Google knows about Any Forums since Any Forums results for pictures and some TXT posts will show up.
Now try this 1) Make a post containing a unique TXT sequence or file name, use basically random characters however I have this confirmed for real words like >angry_cat_in_car,jpg Or something like this. 2) Post it on Any Forums 3) Wait some time 4) Try to find this picture by either searching the name on google or the post. Use exact name search You will literally never find it, the best joke is that you can find newer posts on Any Forums using google this way however not this picture that exists.
6) Go to the Any Forums archive 7) Do a exact text search for file name or something the guy did say in the thread. Change the structure like
>cat_that_is_angry_in_car,jpg Until you hit the right one. 8) get the picture
Post your face when literally a literal TXT search of a file name in a dumb DB has more content and lets you find that picture faster ? Google has 0.00000000000000000000000000000000001% of the actual internet. and it is painfully obvious.
>b-b-b-b-b-b muh alt search engine Same shit 99% of them and copy past what google has.
Do the same test. They know about Any Forums Only will fail if you do this "angry_cat_in_car,jpg"
Craft a file name that is normal for some cool cat picture do the test. o PS: Anyone has that video of that lady who shows there are no google or any other search engine results after page 25 or something ?
I remember seeing it however it is impossible to find in google and friends.
Oh I'm not talking about that, it's impossible to debate you on shit that people can only speculate about so I wouldn't even try. I'm saying that the image was made by someone who's obviously retarded.
Luis Cook
>'m saying that the image was made by someone who's obviously retarded. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_web >The deep web,[1] invisible web,[2] or hidden web[3] are parts of the World Wide Web whose contents are not indexed by standard web search-engines. This is in contrast to the "surface web", which is accessible to anyone using the Internet.[4] Computer-scientist Michael K. Bergman is credited with coining the term in 2001 as a search-indexing term.[5] >The content of the deep web is hidden behind login forms,[6][7] and includes uses such as web mail, online banking, restricted access social-media pages and profiles, some web forums and code language that require registration for viewing content, and paywalled services such as video on demand and some online magazines and newspapers.
>The content of the deep web can be located and accessed by a direct URL or IP address, but may require a password or other security access to get past public pages.
What is your problem zoomer retard ?
>Oh I'm not talking about that, it's impossible to debate you on shit that people can only speculate about
>can only speculate about LOL I did an experiment you can do the same. Can someone post that video already ? Yo u realize that the millions of search results on google are a lie.
Simply click to get to the most far away page you can get on any subject and post the number.
Max 300 results on any subject the millions are a lie.
>Anyone has that video of that lady who shows there are no google or any other search engine results after page 25 or something ?
It is easy to replicate. Enter a search term, click the last of the pages (like 10). Do this a few times and there are no more pages. Total results are now: about 400.
Adam Reyes
what the fuck is this thread has the zoomer invasion bega
Justin Nelson
This is a interesting post. It has a new cat picture. It is named >extra 3 data cat for you It is a extra data cat picture for you.
The fun part is that you will not find it on google EVER even if you search "extra 3 data cat for you"
Lol, copy/paste some more shit at me, I'm enjoying this. >zoomer retard I'm probably twice your age you fucking dumbass.
Joshua Lopez
I know. Only I wanted that video to show what I'm talking about.
>Total results are now: about 400. I do not get more then 300 on any subject even things like CATS non nonpolitical etc
I do not thing anyone goes after page 5 since the results are so trash and become more and more irrelevant.
I really want to archive that video. Anyone know about it ?
Jose Davis
Google is not that good for dynamic content. Their crawler will fetch a site every now and then. Most of it is not captured.
The Any Forums archive only needs to poll about 10 main pages for each board it creates an archive for and when a thread is created, one for each thread. Google tries to keep up to date on all of the web. You enter more and more websites. Now when you rotate through them, you will quickly come to a crawl. It will take very long until you went through all of them, maybe a year. Or longer. For Google, they have lots of resources, so they can go through all websites more quickly. But they still need to make compromises. Google probably doens't care much about Any Forums since they prefer not to show it anyway. So they don't need to download updates often either.
Ethan Smith
>I'm probably twice your age you fucking dumbass. Yet you are 8 times more retarded.
>Lol, copy/paste It is a normie fact. What is yoru objection ? That google ™ has the best and most search results on the internet so we all should use google ™ on google.com ™ owned by google ™ LLC.
Jack Foster
It would be a good experiment to create a web site that you host and put a forum on the webhost. Then find out how often do Google crawlers arrive and do they go into the threads. You can see this in the logs.
Owen Rivera
>Google is not that good for dynamic content. Why is google not crawling Any Forums archive then it is STATIC.
>Google probably doens't care much about Any Forums since they prefer not to show it anyway. Yet they do it for other Any Forums archive content. HMMMMmmm.
>Google probably doens't care much about Any Forums since they prefer not to show it anyway. Google also obviously does not care about reddit or DA or actually anything. In my experience google search results are limited and you will get better results if you go to DA itself and search the subject.
The biggest joke is that searching youtube.com is a better idea then searching videos on google itself.
So what is the problem here google/youtube is not letting google.com get its database of search results ? What ?! It is owned by the same corporation you think after over 6 years of owning youtube google copy past or integrate the results form youtube.com better however NOPE.
>Google is not that good for dynamic content. Define dynamic and static content.
Nathaniel Perez
Semi good experiment however NO; google does not care for small personal web pages anymore.
this is why you get facebook pictures and facebook link on google.com all the time.
A better idea is to post a original work of text that obviously dose not look like some bot generated spam to a relatively big website and see how fast you can find it with exact TXT search on google
Levi Jenkins
>What is yoru objection ? You know I was going to write an actual response but I then I saw your rebuttals in and now I'm not even going to bother wasting my time. Have fun junior, stay in school, keep learning.
Zachary Fisher
>>Google probably doens't care much about Any Forums since they prefer not to show it anyway. >Yet they do it for other Any Forums archive content. >HMMMMmmm.
Good point. Any Forums has asked google not to create archives: Right click and show source
Yes, they will look for updates on big websites very often but not on small websites.
But when they download a small website and put it into their index, they will most of the time still not show it in search results anyway.
Cameron Gomez
All these posters are bots:
Tell google to get a gpt3 subscription not this trash !
Elijah Allen
>Good point. Any Forums has asked google not to create archives: Right click and show source Yet google is doing it. Explain.
> What is this shit ?! Back in my day we used ROBOTS.TXT !
Lincoln Mitchell
>they will most of the time still not show it in search results anyway. Yea. LOL.
>Yes, they will look for updates on big websites very often but not on small websites. I think (someone needs to do your experiment first) that google now has literally stopped indexing anything that is not a big website.
Ryder Mitchell
kek the robots.txt for Any Forums just allows everything right?
