techpowerup.com
>I'm not gonna make a commitment yet on frequency, but what I will say is that *5.5 GHz was very easy* for us. The Ghostwire demo was one of many games that achieved that frequency *on an early-silicon prototype 16-core part with an off-the-shelf liquid cooler*
Is there Pluton or not?
windows already owns everything on your pc
>5.5 was very easy for us because we cranked the voltage so high the CPU will die after the warranty period expires
Yes, very good AMD, we're all very proud of you.
>Is the X670E chipset fanless?
>It's fanless
AW YISS
Look in the mirror, intbecile.
I'm actually looking at the stock voltages on my 5800X. 7 nm is already prone to degradation, expect 5 nm to be even more fragile.
you can disable the pluton but you need tpm for windows 11
I have a 5800X3D and you're a literal sub-21 IQ intbecile.
The 5800X3D doesn't boost to 4.85 GHz, so it can stay at a "fairly safe" 1.35V. Good thing AMD won't even allow you to touch the multiplier or Vcore. Reminder that AMD gives zero fucks if your fancy new 7800X lasts 3 years or 10 years.
You forgot to log in, UserBenchmark cocksucker:
>mindless fanboy drone has no idea how transistors work
Read the text in the pic, intbecile.
I don't care what UserBenchmark has to say, faggot. This is about AMD pumping dangerous amounts of voltage into their new chips so they can advertise higher boost clocks. I'm sure Zen 4 will be even worse considering the TDP and 5.5+ GHz boost. I honestly have no idea if Intel does the same thing now because I haven't bought one of their chips since 2014.
For me it's the 5900hx
And for those of us that care about TDP?
intel has been doing the same thing lmao their chips have 140w tdps, the other user is a fucking mindless retard though.
>intel has been doing the same thing lmao their chips have 140w tdps
That's not really the same thing, Zen 3 runs at a very reasonable voltage during high load (~1.2V) but the problem is when it boosts it goes all the way up to 1.45-1.5V causing power/temperature spikes and (presumably) transistor degradation. I don't know if Intel's boost algorithm is as aggressive and if they need that much voltage to reach their boost clocks. AMD is bruteforcing 4.8-5 GHz on Zen 3.
STFU, jew shill.
>up to 5.2ghz
>requires insane cooler
>241w power draw
>1.4v is considered underclocking on the 12900k
huh?
>1.4v is considered underclocking on the 12900k
Then Intel is probably doing the exact same thing. I honestly don't think we'll see many of these CPUs lasting for more than 5 years.
old.reddit.com/r/intel/comments/uat2uo/i9_12900k_i_ran_a_quick_benchmark_is_this_voltage
>Just try gradually lowering the Voltage if this bothers you. Might be able to go down to something like 1.4
Yep, seems Intel is doing the same thing on Alder Lake. 1.4-1.45 V was considered the max safe voltage on fucking Piledriver, and those chips were indestructible. Tiny 10nm/7nm transistors will definitely degrade faster than 32nm.
I wonder why no one is complaining about idle temperatures on Alder Lake but maybe that's because Intel cheats by averaging the value over a long period of time or using less sensors.