Rebelbros, our time has come

Rebelbros, our time has come

Attached: 1653593433517.png (824x841, 660.18K)

modern web design is terrible.
UX design used to be made by technical people so it was intuitive to use and fundamentally systematic. Now it's generally about consuming an experience where you have no control.
On top of this everything on the front end is over-engineered and bloated.

I'm a technical person and my UX Design is absolute zero kelvin garbage.
A baby dies every time I attempt doing UX.

and?
not all technical people are the same.

you should choose reliable designs that stood the test of time instead of treating every UI creation as an exam to express your autistic inner trauma and political views.

Journalism was a mistake

yeah, but you're probably just using standard html elements instead of trying to reinvent everything and force autoscroll magic and breaking browser history etc etc

Sure, systematic, simple and intuitive designs as I mentioned. I don't know about the other self projecting stuff you mentioned.

>made by technical people
>so it was intuitive to use
lol
lmao even

same old 90's magazine layout is being recycled for the web

Attached: download.jpg (600x828, 121.47K)

Yes.
Compare pic related to the horrendous modern facebook design as just one basic example.
The older one is compact, informative and makes sense.

Attached: facebook.png (550x418, 195.54K)

Sure love that by "rebellious", the journalist who wrote this trite means that it's just flatshit but with fucked up proportions. Bring back skeumorphic design or something inbetween, that was when UI/UX design was good.

Columns and pages > SCROLL, SCROLL, SCROLL

Works for desktop but no good for mobile

as opposed to working on mobile but not desktop?
Just separate the two.

That's just the difference between one guy working on a project and tens of thousands working on it.
In German you say "zu viele Köche verderben den Brei"

This looks like an absolute spaghetti mess to implement in CSS.

I disagree, good UX design is both intuitive and easily recognizable. It's just that so many people/companies have a web page / app nowadays that it's easy to find shitty examples, and harder to find good ones.

ugly, TMI, not focused on what's important (the timeline)

I certainly get what you mean but I don't think that's a universal excuse for the modern problem in design. The youtube ux is still mostly good in my book for example even if it has a bunch of people working on it.
My problem also comes down to small projects often copying the trends found in larger ones so what seems to happen is that the current ui/ux sickness gets almost everywhere even if it's made by a small close group.
Experience is now valued above functionality.

Always weird to see people that didn't use 90's/00's Internet fetishize the aesthetics of it.

It's not really ugly but sure it needs an update for modern standards.
I disagree that it's tmi. The personal info component is specifically opened so that is what the person on the user end was looking for. It's a personal profile with well separated components and links so with a brief gloss-over you can get to where you want to go without a hassle. Same goes with the sidebar.

The true web rebellion would be a return to static HTML with no in-built CSS.

just do what everyone did in 2010, make m.website.com and website.com

I'm so happy I found emacs. It's very relaxing to find something that works, and know that it won't suddenly be changed tomorrow. Design is hard to get right, and unfortunately, designers tend to be awful at it.

Attached: emacs.png (5120x2816, 386.95K)

>every website looks exactly the same because they all use the same cookie cutter templates and services
>the era of rebellious
Whoever wrote that should rebel off a fucking cliff. What a retard.

This is something that isn't spoken about as much as it should be. Just changing shit constantly is unsettling no matter the age or competency of the user. You mention emacs, but it's the same with vi. It wont randomly decide to switch commands or whatever.

>I disagree that it's tmi
When I go to a profile, do you really think I need to know about this person's hobbies, email, sex, location? When the platform is based about content sharing?

I guess it depends on the intention, but the modern design is much more focused on the latest updates someone has posted (or shared), while still showing the mini-bio, because the main focus point is supposed to be the content, not so much the person...

Sidebar does look pretty comfy, though takes up a lot of space, still not much difference from what it is today.

>doesn't work well on mobile
so, literal perfection

This. Bring back the changing of elements by the browser and the site making no assumptions about presentation.

what the fuck are you looking at their profile for, then?

>When I go to a profile, do you really think I need to know about this person's hobbies, email, sex, location? When the platform is based about content sharing?
>I guess it depends on the intention
I'm laughing for real.

shave that perm off you little zoomer cunt

as I said, depends on the intention, on my side usually it is to see latest posts. Facebook is supposed to be for people you already know, so really most of the time you're looking at updates

I mean sure laugh but clearly it's what most users care about, the design has stood the test of time. You can't really please everyone, for all use cases. And again, the current design does still keep at least a summarised version of that information.

tha'ts just most brutalist websites

Thats so 2010

>it's what most users care abou
a bold claim