Pre 2022

I don't think the model will have enough data to make it usable

it needs to be trained on actual data of

>blurred if not premium
dropped

Not gonna lie, that's a based idea.

society is not ready for this
imagine how easy it would be to create revenge porn

Attached: greed.jpg (1988x2048, 517.69K)

>revenge porn
it wouldn't be that at all

first of all, fuck you sick bastards. but you should definitely have the option to buy animatronic dolls that look a certain way, and rent them out to other degenerates like yourselves. give them an AI, who cares, it's never going to be sentient. banning little dolls is just forcing pedo's hands where technology has a clear solution. i hate you fuckers but it should absolutely be legal

What do you mean "trained on actual data"?

it means you need thousands of similar pictures of what you want ML to generate

I see. No one has that much children images.

That's how ML/AI works

you have a corpus of data where the model is learned on. GPT is learned on lot of texts, deepfake is learned on lot of faces.

So they need to teach the model by showing it a lot of nude women. That's literally how this works. They probably don't have lot of photos of young kids.

CRASH THE SEXUAL MARKET
CRASH THE SEXUAL MARKET
CRASH THE SEXUAL MARKET

No it shouldn't. Pedos should just be shot and used as fertilizer. They don't deserve rights.

Somewhere an FBI agent sneezed

>The image below is blurred because you are not a premium user.
wasnt there a ml project that could remove blur?

Attached: dn.png (888x898, 805.52K)

>gets denied
We would spend hours in photoshop but it was doable. Bubble porn was fun too.

>blurred
into the trash it goes

>censored

You are a homosexual. You should be hanged from a crane in Iran.

Attached: download (42).png (256x256, 104.32K)

>muh pedos
you don't even have kids you dumb moralfag
you just want the grooming monopoly

>Bubble porn was fun too.
Good times on Any Forums desu

>$30 to see anything more than a blurry thumbnail
this is 100% a scam for horny retards

Attached: 1631773668186.png (240x240, 61.53K)

not much revenge in uploading revenge porn if everyone could have just generated it themselves

this is extremely scummy
doubly so since they are in it for actual profit

I just get bad vibes all over from how they are advertising it

Who gets to decide what a pedo is? A town? A state? The world? Where is the line drawn, and how? There are people who will unironically call a 30 year old man who fucks a 20 year old girl a pedophile. Who gets to decide what it even is, and who enforces it?

OP is probably the owner

Attached: HEY.jpg (720x405, 49.54K)

You can scroll down on this link and it has the uncensored version (of that specific image) my friend:
deepnude.cc/

Nothing wrong with paedophiles. Just another abnormal sexual attraction. Probably one of the most miserable ones as they'll never be able to act on it and always have to live a fake life.
Acting on it is the problem.

fuck off with your site
you wont get "uncensored" because shit is blurred faggot

> advertising
how is this shit allowed on this site? do your job, jannys

Attached: 1645772720690.png (1088x641, 43.24K)

>No bush
Trained on American whores. Worthless.

Btw nobody has rights. Nobody has any kind of right at all, God-given or otherwise. To think anyone does is delusional

>100% scam
maybe or maybe not, considering that blur looks legit

It's a sample image that's right there on the page uncensored, kek

It's a human concept, that's what we're talking about, retard.