>X11 has a bunch of problems that we can't name but they really are there ok also it's just old and old bad new good
>our solution is to force you to use this new protocol that has been in development for over a decade and is nowhere near ready for human use and fixes none of X11's non-existing problems while introducing a wide range of new actual problems that will not be fixed because they're all by design
Why do people continue to fall for Red Hat's retardation?
I hate the antichrist
X11 has a bunch of problems that we can't name but they really are there ok also it's just old and old bad new good
John Nguyen
Other urls found in this thread:
gist.github.com
github.com
twitter.com
Brody Cruz
same thing they did with gnome
for me, it's mate on xorg with runit
Hunter Gray
>I hate the antichrist
Why?
Leo Powell
i hate wayland
i hate libadwaita
i hate gnome
i hate proprietary software worshiping gamers
i hate gimp
i hate electron
Austin Richardson
I sure do love having to jump through a dozen hoops just to take a fucking screenshot. Thank you wayland, very cool
Benjamin Hughes
i would say i hate bloat and include these
> (on my opinion) wayland is not that bad tho, it has sandboxed xorg incase
Mason Murphy
cut the middleman and just run straight xorg
Brayden Martin
Wayland is such a fucking circus show of a project it's not even funny anymore.
If it ever matches X11 in functionality, it's going to end up being just as bloated.
Charles Cooper
Remember, Linux for Niggers uses X11.
Landon Nguyen
By the time it does, Wayland will be as old as xorg was when they started development and they will push for yet another protocol that doesn't work for the sake of being new