Bonus question: What's the best terminal-only Linux distro I can put? Thinking of CentOS since I'm familiar with Red Hat from work.
Elijah Baker
>will this perform better than the Pi 4? Going by some simple benchmarks, they're both slow as balls.
Robert Long
I seriously hope you don't expect buttery smooth interaction with that shit heap >perform Performance is relative. At SoC garbage scale nothing performs well. Lower your expectations and you'll be happier with your purchase.
If you're willing to drop $500 you might as well buy an i5 mainboard from the framework laptop marketplace and use it to build one of those keyboard-only computers
John Nelson
Similar performance to the Pi for CPU tasks, much faster GPU, better r/w speeds with the mSATA SSD in the thin client compared to the SD card on the Pi.
Ian Kelly
Man I just one to run Pi Hole and a basic NFS server.
I'm running today on a Pi2 700Mhz and it is fine, but I'm starting to get some alerts "Long-term load (15min avg) larger than number of processors: 1.1 > 1".
I wanted to upgrade to Pi 4 but this Thin Client is probably an OK alternative right?
Nathaniel Moore
>Pi Hole placebo. Ran one. Totally useless. Better spent setting up your own DNS that mirrors root. >NFS and be limited to realistically one drive? Your life senpai. I hoard so that doesn't work for me. by the way, what you're looking for is called a "server" A thin client is like a Chromebook or a smartphone or some useless shit like that. It's something you carry around with you.
Christian Roberts
Pi Hole works fine for me.
>NFS Yes, the main use is to store my emulator save games so I can have my own "cloud" and play from my PC, laptop and steam deck. So I don't need much space and I'm not a hoarder.
Brody Hughes
Then it's a great choice. $30 well spent. Just checking to make sure you knew the limitations.