Alright, you win. I got shilled c# so much that it made me genuinely curious. I will try it but it better turn out to be some exceptionally good language (most likely just an overshilled craplang). Now shill me a roadmap, like where to start or what project to do. Is a console app that automates things on the OS level good?
I really hope you faggot aren't wasting my time.
Other urls found in this thread:
Affinity was made with it and its the best photo editor rn
Really? Affinity was made in C#?? Not C++? That's impressive if it's true.
keep us updated
I have never seen someone dislike c#. It's just a good language.
I was thinking about learning C# to review OOP concepts. C# docs look pretty fire no cap.
I'm not touching Java again, that's for sure.
No it was not made in C# you faggot. The core is written in C++, the Mac GUI in C and the Windows GUI In C# because Windows can't into cross platform GUI despite of what C# fagging shills on this board wanna tell you.
>inb4 muh Avalonia which is bugged as fuck
>inb4 MAUI for which there is not a single production ready app out there
C# is good but .NET and Microsoft are shit.
fucking microsoft, why .net 6 and c# 10 is not available in VS2019? indian faggots what's the problem?
Irrelevant if it doesn't support windows 7.
but it does, you can use .net 6 sdk on win 7 and run .net 6 applications on win 7
it's only fucking visual studio 2019 that was left behind and doesn't support it
well technically it supports targeting .net 6 if you enable preview, but you can't get access to c# 10 features, which makes it pointless
>MAUI for which there is not a single production ready app out there
Oh my God, the dishonesty of this post. MAUI isn't even released yet. It's still a beta product being tested by fans. It didn't even reach production for it to be programs built with it.
>The core is written in C++, the Mac GUI in C and the Windows GUI In C# because Windows can't into cross platform GUI
Most Windows apps are written in C++. If they decided to use C# for a WinUI it was a willing choice. You're trying too hard.
>C# is good but .NET and Microsoft are shit.
No. Microsoft is shit. .NET is one of the major reasons why C# is so great.
Not him but i thought most windows apps these days were written in html
When i said Windows apps i meant apps running on Windows. Not Microsoft Apps. But Yeah, all the recent Microsoft apps were written with a HTML/JS/CSS Client and C++/C# background processes.
You samefagging faggot.
>MAUI isn't even released yet.
No fucking shit and yet you shill it on this board 24/7.
>If they decided to use C# for a WinUI it was a willing choice
Also a bad choice. Now they have two code bases for a shitty GUI. Meanwhile Bitwig's GUI runs flawlessly on Java and has turned in one of the most popular DAWs in no time youtu.be
Keep seething Microshats
>one of the most popular DAWs
It's literally the most powerful DAW right now.
>Bitwig's GUI
Never heard of it
Samefag
>Now they have two code bases for a shitty GUI
Larp. Affinity's ui is perfect as it is.
genuine question:
reason to choose sharp over java?
>Never heard of it
That's because you don't know shit about anything. Anyone who's into audio production knows Bitwig while nobody gives a shit about Affinity which can't and never will compete with Photoshop.
>reason to choose sharp over java?
Literally none. The only reason you would ever pick it over Java is syntactic sugar and if that's important to you you can just use Kotlin which is superior to C#.
Genuine question:
Reason to use Java over virtually anything else? I can't think of a single scenario where there isn't a better option right now
>Bitwig while nobody gives a shit about Affinity which can't and never will compete with Photoshop.
And here you are trolling again. Affinity is without contest the only serious adobe suite competitor and objectively better. Meanwhile it's the first time i hear about your bitwig abandonware. Stay mad nigger and eat shit