Intel 32 cores of smarter design WINNING vs AYYMD 16 cores 170W HOUSEFIRES

32 cores, not threads, retard

8 next-gen P cores, 24 next-gen E-cores that will be closer to Ice Lake P-core in performance

so basically intel copied amd by making "not chiplets" and "not io die"?

Based Intel.

>so basically intel copied amd
not really, leaks suggest they will be stuck with 8 real cores for a while, its only the worthless e cores that multiply like africans.

Intel tiles are not chiplets

They're way better than AYYMD naive chiplets and they're connected through 3D Foveros, next gen 3D packaging that AYYMD simply don't have until TSMC develops it

not chiplets these are Tiles ok sir?

Intel tiles are way more advanced than TSMC chiplets and have significantly lower latency that performance closer to a monolithic chip

Attached: Intel-Meteor-Lake-Big.jpg (1600x1064, 177.01K)

AYYMD inferior chiplet garbage incurs latency penalties when going from 1 chiplet to other chiplet, no amount of cache can help with that

Attached: AMD Computex 2022 Slide Deck 7.jpg (2720x1319, 269.05K)

raptor lake is only 24 cores

Attached: 2020.png (1556x3090, 2.19M)

intelaviv shills do it for free

I don't even care about picking sides in this never-ending, stupid argument, but I just need to point out how retarded you are, OP.
Maybe four, if you're lucky.

So you get 40 threads, then? I'd rather have the full 64 threads. HEDT already does that, and I wouldn't be surprised if consumer-grade AMD components do that within the next year or two.

I like Intel's big-little design, but let's not pretend they're equivalent to AMD's chips. They're quite different beasts now.