Is he actually right or just gatekeeping programming for women?

It's actually illegal in the US to reject a candidate because of their genetics. I wouldn't be bragging about this in public on Twitter.

"so you're implying that people are happier doing what they were biologically set to do? would you be happy just hunting animals?"

Right? Even if he's being ironic, I don't get why people post stuff like this. Always gives me Mad Thad vibes.
>McMichael claimed this post was a joke

Both. Gatekeeping is a necessity to keep the quality of discourse high. Until you're good enough to get around the gatekeeper I do not want you capping up my board/industry/hobby/we. I was gatekept and it made me work to improve myself until I stopped being gatekept.

this guy is a retard troll. He's even worse than you lot, at least you guys are creative

Wtf I love tech lead now

based and our guy pilled, woymen can sit in their daycare HR jobs doing fuck all

He's just straight up shitposting here or fantasizing. He didn't actually do this.

In reality he asked some fizzbuzz questions while sitting there awkwardly and avoiding eye contact.

this faggot is cringe as fuck

Comparing hunting animals to mothering isn't the same. Hunting was just a side effect of the biological need to eat, it's not necessarily natural but it was the easiest and most efficient way for ancient humans to get food. Mothering, on the other hand, is a biological activity. Breasts are meant to feed children and your body releases hormones to bond with the baby as a mother. Women were built for the sole purpose of being mothers.

A better comparison would be asking if a man would be happy going around having sex and impregnating women all day than be a programmer. The answer will always be yes.