Why does Rust use :: instead of . for calling a class method?
Counter::increment() rather than Counter.increment() seems like an unnecessary change to make.
Why does Rust use :: instead of . for calling a class method?
David Butler
Ian Smith
Because the . triggers them and reminds them of the sepples and cniles.
Matthew Davis
It follows C++'s scope resolution operator, which is used to access static class members and resolve namespaces.
Ethan Gutierrez
at this point it's hard to know if this is bait. half of Any Forums really is this retarded nowadays.
Nathan Hall
The dot implies a binary. What is before the dot, and what is after the dot.
Adam Walker
i looked into this language because i hear it shilled everywhere and now i'm experiencing a sunk cost fallacy because i refuse to get filtered by it. someone save me
Owen Brooks
Any community that gets its laughs by pretending to be idiots will eventually be flooded by actual idiots who mistakenly believe that they're in good company.
Charles Sanchez
Switch to C++. Problem solved.
Ayden Young
>reminds them of the sepples
more than :: does?
Asher Johnson
Elaborate.