Women can't cod-

>Women can't cod-

Attached: Screen Shot 2022-05-22 at 8.36.10 pm.png (472x872, 538.48K)

>this totally happened
this is about as real as dinosaurs

Cope

kekd

>e
Claiming Ada Lovelace is the first programmer is like claiming Thomas Edison invented the lightbulb.

>ACK-

>I'm supposed to believe Lovelace somehow wrote code for Babbage's machine before Babbage did.

It appears DE&I was a fraud, even back then.

Attached: 1653214621200.jpg (802x840, 96.46K)

Attached: MargaretHamiltonComposite-1024x698.jpg (1024x698, 104.9K)

same story as turing breaking the enigma.

Attached: 279593698_1038453263687157_1332728832444354712_n.jpg (455x459, 21.63K)

>analytical engine developed entirely by someone else
>simps have to ignore the fact she used someone elses' work because that's the relationship higher education formed with women
I get she was the best of her extremely limited field but most certainly not the first.
I would argue first Hacker, if you actually understand that word beyond the Hollywood fantasies.

>I want to believe women can't do shit therefore it can't be true

Attached: le pol face.png (645x770, 16.07K)

If you believe anything you read, you are pretty dumb.

Who switched her face with Daniel Radcliffe lmao?

Slow down, Satan

>>women can't cod
indeed

Attached: FDD607B6-1A1A-439A-B7A4-5C03E125CFAE.jpg (390x278, 35.2K)

I remember going in a tech museum with a friend and when they telled us this he said "Yeah yeah she totally did it, come on, tell us the name of his husband already".
Magnificent

>Didn't even succeeded in what she was doing.
>Not to mention she's a student of a ultimate simp.
>"All but one of the programs cited in her notes had been prepared by Babbage from three to seven years earlier. The exception was prepared by Babbage for her, although she did detect a "bug" in it. Not only is there no evidence that Ada ever prepared a program for the Analytical Engine, but her correspondence with Babbage shows that she did not have the knowledge to do so."
Believing that women can code is same as believing that unicorn exist. I'll believe it when I see it.

Wait.... Didn't Thomas Edison invented the light bulb?

Nope, it was Joseph Swan.

hail

>entire wiki (leftist territory) full of actual computer science scholars saying she didn't even make that much of an impact on computers beyond writing better maths
>doesn't matter because (((everything is political))) and """the future is female"""
There could be a great discussion to be had about her, instead we need to maintain a system of lies because some retard who posts "le pol face" to someone accurately summing up the situation.
People still believe Thomas Edison invented the light bulb, I might remind you.

>be Babbage
>simp so hard you essentially erase your own name from history by attaching your achievements and reputation to the target of your simping

I hope he at least got to coom in her. He gave it everything he had.

Attached: 1652972613875.jpg (690x720, 77.02K)

>entire wiki (leftist territory)
Yes. "Leftists" as you claim don't tell people not to pursue an education at all because they want people to be educated and knowledgeable about the real world. As such, it's only natural to expect them to have more control over encyclopedias.

>full of actual computer science scholars saying she didn't even make that much of an impact on computers beyond writing better maths
Name 20.

>doesn't matter because (((everything is political))) and """the future is female"""
Again with the spiteful Any Forumscel crying about politics in science that gets mysteriously quiet when right-wingers do it.

>There could be a great discussion to be had about her
"I fucking hate wahmen" is not great discussion.

>People still believe Thomas Edison invented the light bulb, I might remind you.
I don't care. We're talking about the first programmer.