Go fuck yourself you piece of shit, you're good for absolutely fucking nothing. Kill yourself...

Go fuck yourself you piece of shit, you're good for absolutely fucking nothing. Kill yourself, and have a good day while you're at motherfucker.

Attached: 1652659427258.png (800x246, 62.6K)

fpbp

based

webp is like jpeg but it can compress up shit better and export as lossless.

People using it, on the other hand:
>shall not re-encode jpegs in webp
>shall not re-encode webps in webp
>shall not re-encode at ALL

webp files that are lossless should be marked as ".lwebp" as their extension

>but user, it sucks!
it does not. Lack of support of the spec on the other hand, sucks. Don't blame it on webp, blame it on how it is used and how little recognition its getting.

ask me how i know you're a wintoddler

It's saves Israel billionaires $0.0000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 on server costs actually

it saves around 1~2kb per thumbnail image on my end, this adds up quickly.

Why does ChadP make Any Forums seethe so much?

Attached: webpchad.jpg (366x400, 35.12K)

cause they obviously never had to use it cause "muh 128mb drive is enuff"

what is the actual best image format? I see no point in these shitty formats as PNG just werks.

OPBP

>should be
standards are about efficiency not satisfying people who sit in their own shit

>I see no point
being technologically illiterate is like that yes
go make a "pens are technology" thread where you can feel more comfortable

JXL

WebP is based. The problem is this dumbass site has yet to implement support for it.

No. I run a service that serves terabytes of image bandwidth every month. It saves on speed, storage space and is now compatible with every evergreen browser.

If you just took a peek at the first few bytes of the container, you'd see the VP8L marker. If you want to give it a special file extension, that's up to you, just do it.

websites have started heavily embracing so a significant % of images you download will be WebP but Any Forums and Windows still don't support it.

Windows does support it though.

Attached: best_image_viewer.png (571x98, 9.47K)

>a significant % of images you download will be WebP
Only YouTube breaks, if you don't allow webp in GET-requests, though.
Which should tell you a lot about the format...

It's great for thumbnails, kind of pointless for anything else.

>Windows doesn't support it
Webp is based now. Anything that breaks Windows needs to be actively embraced.
>4chin doesn't support it
This platform is garbage tier crap written in php and probably outsourced. What do you expect

Attached: 1642716231203.jpg (1000x1000, 175.4K)