Why are we still using something that was ivnented 50 years ago?
Why are we still using something that was ivnented 50 years ago?
Aiden Powell
Other urls found in this thread:
Nathan Taylor
if it aint broken, dont fix it
Jaxon Turner
Why are we still using something that was ivnented 50 years ago?
Josiah Clark
ah a toilet, just like...
rust
Benjamin Parker
Because you touch yourself at night.
Cooper Foster
You are still using English as well.
Kevin Foster
>Why are we still using something ivnented 6500 years ago?
Jonathan Wright
still the fastest
still the smallest executables
50yrs worth of knowledge and improvements
Easton Young
You can buy AAA batteries and put them in a 50 years old device
Justin Sullivan
wow, really? i can? thanks, uncle user!
Chase Wilson
because you only learned js
Easton Butler
It just werks
Lucas Thompson
Shit question. There were better langs in the 70s too.
Austin Richardson
Because C is the perfect timeless language.
It doesn't need to constantly justify its own existence with stupid gimmicks or gay paradigms, it just is.
Matthew Flores
>old bad
Bentley Parker
>It doesn't need to constantly justify its own existence with stupid gimmicks or gay paradigms
Array decay and null-terminated strings are stupid gimmicks.
Carson Ramirez
C philosophy:
>if it's broken, you're not allowed to fix it
C is not bad because it's old. It was bad when it was new.
github.com
Zachary Nelson
Bash is everything you need.
Fuck bytefags.
Colton Cooper
Neither of those are gimmicks
Lern 2 English
Evan Adams
>better langs in the 70s too
Like Pascal
Kayden Allen
rust philosophy:
>if it works, break it and rebuild it
Tyler Edwards
Anons, what are the good modern books on C? Or is the OP pic still the best one?