Add noatime to your fstab entries, user :3

Add noatime to your fstab entries, user :3

Attached: 7fc16d5e6b841f136494dcadbc64cb7f.jpg (2618x3651, 465.42K)

I use f2fs which doesn't support noatime

No I don't think I will take advice from pedophiles.

i want to add my cummies to noa-chan's cunny

Attached: 617.gif (320x320, 436.5K)

Why not?

Attached: fresh_juice.jpg (638x717, 151.3K)

What does that do?

Turns off updating a files atime timestamp.

How much of a performance difference does it make?

st = [ ['Anna', 98.5, 77.5, 89, 93.5, 85.5],
['Bob', 77, 66.5, 54, 90, 85.5],
['Sam', 98, 97, 89.5, 92.5, 96.5],
['user' , 44.6, 88.0, 77.8, 100, 100],
['Apu', 99.6, 88.7,88.4, 98.9, 77.9],
]
r = 0
for i in st:
while r [['Anna'], 444.0]
[['Bob'], 373.0]
[['Sam'], 473.5]
[['user'], 410.4]
[['Apu'], 453.5] [\code]

Incredibly based

What?

>f2fs
QRD?
How stable is it?

the fsck on it is worthless unless you enable a bunch of newer option flags at mkfs time, also you have to enable compression manually, and throw in a few extra flags so it'll make the saved space actually usable to the OS, compression under f2fs was meant to save write cycles, not to give you more space.

I run it on a eMMC chromebook and it runs about 20% faster, though it can be chalked up to pure placebo really.

Can be quite a bit, I've seen claims of up to 30% performance improvement. There's also the matter of not eating up write cycles on a ssd as well.
The caveat is that it'll mess with applications that need to know if a file has been read since the last time it was modified.

Breaks old mail programs and doesn't improve performance.

The default (relatime) behavior is to keep atime in memory and only write it out if you're going to rewrite the metadata anyway.

Your ancestors are "pedophiles"

I already did.

Attached: 1648519746150.jpg (1249x1539, 245.17K)

0%

Yes

Attached: b774bb70-aebf-11ec-875c-51d31844a814.png (474x244, 173.73K)

imagine the nakadashi

Attached: 1619252096328.png (720x648, 176.2K)