is wikipedia obsolete, Any Forums?
Is wikipedia obsolete, Any Forums?
Gavin Bell
Aiden Perry
No but it's hugely biased towards a jewish worldview. It's useful to see the archived version (10+ years) of articles on wayback machine sometimes.
Nathan Peterson
>he doesn't know he can just click history and see every change to the article right on Wikipedia
Gavin Clark
I don't want to see a diff, I want to see the entire article in its past form
Luke Howard
It shows you that too, just below the diff.
Dominic Rivera
as corrupt as american media
okay for general info, otherwise
Aaron Williams
Tranny faggot glowboy post
Jack Sanders
Depends for what
files.catbox.moe
Joshua Hall
It is one of the best resources for finding high resolution copies of Classical paintings.
Zachary Davis
I think so
David Collins
Based and culturepilled
Luis Turner
Ridiculous bias. God knows how fucked up it really is. Probably affects things that we don't even notice.
Compare:
en.m.wikipedia.org
to
en.m.wikipedia.org
And try searching for "male genital mutilation" and "female circumcision"
Noah Ortiz
for the anons unaware:
zone47.com
Luis Adams
The articles are titled as the concepts are commonly referred to in English (see descriptive vs prescriptive).
More importantly, how about you try reading the titles instead of crying about the titles? You might learn how much bigger of a problem "fgm" is than "mgm".
Noah Peterson
What do you recommend as a reliable source for information anons?
I read books for most topics like Math, since they are more complete, but for general information (which I would like to go deep into), do I have to find a book for each topic or is there an alternative Wiki?
Or should I use schoolar search engines
Michael Ross
What you really want is to browse Wikimedia Commons which is where all the photos are actually hosted.
Chase Rivera
>haven't used it in a while
>check something
>"please donate oh god please"
>check something later
>"you haven't donated last time, here's a reminder"
>check something later
>"we've reminded you already, you have to donate!"
and that's where I stopped using it entirely
Ryan Allen
>not using Encyclopædia Britannica like a true scholar
Chase Fisher
It's fine except for retards who think that Wikipedia should include "holocaust is a lie" articles
Colton Hill
if you want it to be (((reliable))) according to the Jewish university system and the Jewish media, then wikipedia is unironically perfect
Adam Torres
It's a slave to the academic peer-review system, which itself has been exploited to manufacture truth too many times to be a definitively reliable metric in 2022.
Jack Brown
the power mods on it ruin any chance it had at being open and free