>mogs your x86 cpu
Mogs your x86 cpu
Damn the latency must be high af.
That's a big sur.
actually really disappointing that apple chose to make an ARM CPU, if they had made an x86 CPU with a die that big, it actually would have mogged everyone else
The actual chip covers the area of the thermal paste stain. The rest is dram chips.
baka
1. they don't have a loicense
2. there's too much legacy cruft for apple of all companies to make a fast x86
3. they have been making arm cpus for a long time
>mogs your currynigger CPooU
4U
>Can't run x86 software
In the trash it goes
Not anti-semitic enough for me
it literally can
poorly
>>mogs
nope. not even close.
>bigger = better
> tfw the airbook mainboard be like
Ah so apple just makes it even harder to reball faulty ram chips eh?
I dare you to read the x86 ISA spec. Fuck that shit
>2. there's too much legacy cruft for apple of all companies to make a fast x86
Actually would like a reasonable explanation to why you think "legacy cruft" would have an effect
x86 hasn't implemented instructions in actual silicon in over two decades
>3. they have been making arm cpus for a long time
and they're still shit. but i don't blame apple for the woeful performance, it's the limitations of ARM. great power savings! poor single core performance. needs many other specialised cores to get comparable performance of CISC. apple's wet dream of ARM in actual computers (that straight & white men use) hasn't been going spectacularly well anyway. i see more hype than fruit machines on desks.
>Actually would like a reasonable explanation to why you think "legacy cruft" would have an effect
probably won't get one, i think anons ran out of reasons to argue.
>beats my CPU by 2000 points while having 8 more cores and costing $3500 more
>mogs
?
Legacy cruft is Windows. Remember, Windows has to work with obscure systems written 20 years ago in Winforms and ActiveX propping up businesses far and wide