>PrivacyBadger: redundant
>HTTPS Everywhere: redundant
uBo/uMatrix is all you need
Just a reminder that FF tracking protection is completely useless
Ryan Davis
Other urls found in this thread:
techradar.com
en.m.wikipedia.org
cnet.com
digdeeper.neocities.org
bugzilla.mozilla.org
blog.mozilla.org
forbes.com
ghacks.net
ghacks.net
madaidans-insecurities.github.io
phoronix.com
arstechnica.com
twitter.com
Colton Miller
Retard, those extensions work before tracking protection to prevent addon breakage. If you turn off the firefox tracking tracking protection and start visiting bloated websites like coinmarketcap or cnn, that graph will suddenly be full of garbage
Tyler Rodriguez
*If you turn off ublock origin and umatrix and turn on ETP strict in about:preferences, that graph will suddenly be full of garbage
Henry Morris
Why would i ever visit those garbage sites faggot? 4ch is the only retarded site i visit besides the "normal" sites.
Christian Baker
look at the picrel it literally never blocked anything, which means uBo/uMatrix have already picked everything before ff was able to.
I don't understand what are you trying to say, that i shouldn't trust my eyes?
Retard.
Eli Brown
Always has been
Michael Davis
If you need it in clearer terms, The built-in tracking protection kicks in AFTER extensions, so if you're using uBO and uMatrix and those are already blocking everything, there will be nothing left for firefox itself to find and block, so about:protections will be empty.
Zachary Gutierrez
brave doesn't have this problem
Jack Lopez
This is what it looks like when you turn off ublock
Jason Myers
Well that was the point of the post, thanks for clarifying that Mr. obvious..
Why would i turn off uBo??
Joseph Morales
>Brave
>has 999 problems but this isn't one of them.
Funny name for the browser, literally run and used by the cowards. kek
Dominic Hall
uMatrix is dead tho
Lucas Harris
Recently adding ads to the URL bar
techradar.com
EME DRM botnet downloaded by default
Pocket (proprietary service, ads, promoted content)
en.m.wikipedia.org
>The integration was controversial, as users displayed concerns for the direct integration of a proprietary service into an open source application, and that it could not be completely disabled without editing advanced settings, unlike third-party extensions.
Automatically installing Mr. Robot adware through experimental extensions program
cnet.com
Promotes Cloudflare DNS MitM botnet
digdeeper.neocities.org
Inferior fingerprinting protection and other leaks
bugzilla.mozilla.org
Breaking compatibility for old extensions
blog.mozilla.org
Breaking add-on certificate signing, disabling NoScript on Tor browser and threatening millions of users
forbes.com
Breaking css UI customization features
Breaking user modifiable options (most recent compact mode)
ghacks.net
Removing about:config sorting and filtering, completely removed on Android
ghacks.net
Poor security, even with Fission they are years behind (especially on Android)
madaidans-insecurities.github.io
Overall performance sucks and has not improved (loses in 90% of benchmarks)
phoronix.com
Brandon Rivera
Don't care, didn't read, never gonna use the shitty spyware. get lost shill
Jeremiah Williams
arstechnica.com
>The rankings were revealed in a research paper published by Trinity College Dublin computer scientist Doug Leith. He analyzed and rated the privacy provided by Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, Apple Safari, Brave, Edge, and Yandex. Specifically, the study examined the browsers’ sending of data—including unique identifiers and details related to typed URLs—that could be used to track users over time. The findings put the browsers into three categories with Brave getting the highest ranking, Chrome, Firefox, and Safari receiving a medium ranking, and Edge and Yandex lagging behind the rest.
Jose Bell
So what was it replaced with? I doubt NoScript is all that useful with uBo. Do uBo rules now cover for both extensions?
Asher Powell
firefox strict tracking protection is enough to block ads on one imageboard, so i use it sometimes when i am too lazy to install ub0
Xavier Reyes
Mozilla is shit but brave isn't any better - it is most definitely worse. Not gonna ever use it no matter the amount of shilling.
>picrel basic "brave" user
Asher Brooks
It's the first extension i install and i've been using it since it's inception. never gonna get into situation where it's not installed, well unless the gorhill retires uBo as well..
Levi Phillips
uBO has better script blocking than NoScript since uBO can do local rules and NoScript cannot
Nah, Mozilla has done far worse than Brave
Luke Phillips
>when i am too lazy to install ub0
what the fuck? How often do you need to install the same fucking extension? I installed ublock years ago and I only had to install it again when I got a new machine.
Landon Flores
edup