Who was in the wrong here?

Based, pedos BTFOd

the user is always right (for their own tastes). Also attacking people for their shitty taste in hobbies is retarded.

The gay one

Attached: cute.jpg (1920x1080, 145.19K)

>pedophilia
>hobby

My money is on the dude with a loli avatar

This but without the liberal feefees. The customer is always right, that is the essence of capitalism and the path to marketshare. Take the best suggestions, and take what makes other applications popular as far as is feasible without pulling a Firefox, but keep to the spirit of the project. MPV is perfect functionally, but the UI and keybinds can be a pain in the ass sometimes.

Attached: 1647744708932.jpg (1280x720, 234.22K)

the pedo
the ui indeed is very shitty

cunny board tho

Now that is question
First, lets get started by entering into the domain of what is wrong and right. Is there something such as wrongness that can be quantitatively analyzed? Can we say that one of these individuals is more or less wrong than the other and therefore a threshold for proper wrongness can be defined?
For now lets assume that this threshold is as simple as a comparison of wrongness, whoever holds this degree of wrongness more than the other, will be defined as wrong.
Now, we can see both are users of twitter, which makes both of them unequivocally wrong, consequently we can assume that the difference of wrongness between these two will be relatively small, on the full scale of things, however, if we abide by our predefined threshold, we can instead further analyze each element which composes the wrongness of each of these individuals.
The first individual seems to be a self proclaimed weeaboo, with a passion of criticizing senseless stuff and "unique" profile pictures. On the wrongness scale we can safely assume this is terrible, and usually could safely assume that this person is on the wrong under our predefined threshold.
Now, remarkably so, the absurdity of the reply and the inclusion of something so disconnected from the original topic seems to indicate a certain insecurity on the replier's side, this makes it difficult to estimate who of them hold more wrongness and therefore, it can't be determined who is actually more wrong; that is unless after careful observation, you can notice that the replier didn't bother to respond until after 20 hours which might indicate that the previous safe assumption might not be as obvious as it seemed, which leads us to 2 possible conclusions:
Who is more wrong can't be determined unless with further information, it can be determined that the replier doesn't actually hold any insecurity regarding mpv's ui, which would meant that weeabob is in the wrong.
Another possibility is that you're a faggot lmao

Keybinds can be easily customized

This

Attached: cunny_website.png (1633x858, 228.37K)

Based.

Yeah but the fact that you need to use keybinds for so many things is just annoying. I would like to be able to change the volume without accidentally changing some other setting.

both, the UI is good and there was no reason to bring up child pornography

people arent like this irl? this sure cant be real

Totally uncalled for. Dude looks like some kind of ironic weeb and calling him a pedo out of the blue was just stupid.
I use mpv myself though and like the design. It's unintrusive and practical.

taking a light dig at the guy was fine
randomly saying he's a pedophile because anime avatar was misguided (anime is too mainstream for it to even make much sense as an insult)

by the way this isn't technology