This is the future of Linux
This is the future of Linux
Mason Williams
Other urls found in this thread:
github.com
man.voidlinux.org
voidlinux.org
twitter.com
Isaiah Ross
>Doesn't impact linux in the slightest
>This is the future of linux!!!!!!
Yes user, good is good but void is the future of linux.
XBPS software is the best software that exists as of right now
For people who are tech-illiterate to a certain degree, yes, Fedora is good but i don't get how silverblue is suppposed to influence anything
Joshua James
xbepis is a piece of trash, barely any better than pacman.
Isaiah Lee
Pacman is trash, and i'm reffering mostly to
xbps-src ( github.com
The ultimate package builder
xtools ( man.voidlinux.org
The best way to use your system and maintain it
xbps-* ( voidlinux.org
Omega based fast packaging system
Gabriel Allen
>not reproducible
>not hermetic
>not source/binary hybrid with automatic caching
>no multi-version support
It's garbage.
Luis Phillips
nixos already did it better if you want a system like that.
Adrian Ross
nix is as much of a meme as gentoo
You are either an enthusiast or a retard
Ryan Rogers
Why?
Daniel Myers
Obsoleted by docker and ostree
Eli Long
How so?
Blake Turner
not him but i have posted images of this before.
an OSTREE based image is for a general end user because you dont have to learn an entire programming language to use.
As for docker/podman whatever most of the work if you do install OSTree is done via toolbox or distrobox(i prefer distrobox)
you can run containers of multiple distros at the same time, even graphical programs and everything.
Gabriel Foster
>an OSTREE based image is for a general end user because you dont have to learn an entire programming language to use.
Instead you have to figure out a build system capable of putting together an OSTree system. Those tend to be radically complex.
>you can run containers of multiple distros at the same time, even graphical programs and everything.
This is just a poor means to an end. Nix can run multiple package versions at the same time, without the overhead of an entire container. Things like "even graphical programs" don't even come up because it just runs the program. There is no magic involved that would somehow make graphical programs a special case.
Logan Ross
user if you believe nix os is the proper solution then why dont you design an easy way to use it.
make the ubuntu of nix os.
The way nix is right now i think it is rather complicated to use.
Wyatt Lopez
>refuses to elaborate further
Elijah Wright
now produce a distro without syst*md and i might even try it
Andrew Butler
nobody cares
Isaiah Cox
I just broke popos. I see a lot of people shilling nixOSand it seems interesting but too complex for me.
I want to use my Linux machine to do drawings with a graphic tablet on krita. Would fedora kinoite be a good option? (It's the kde variant of silver blue)
Ayden James
Void Linux is super easy to break in my experience. xbps -Rs oO remove ton a essential dependencies
Elijah Long
sure, it's extremely stable and if anything breaks you can rollback last deployment
it's also very easy to use, just make sure you add the Flathub repository and you're good
Jason Butler
I have a Broadcom wifi, seems like it doesn't work out of the box? I can connect to the router but the connection is very slow, unusable. It's an old MacBook air so no Ethernet. Am i out of luck?
Owen Kelly
try a USB wifi adapter, they're pretty cheap and should work just fine
Aaron Perez
>proprietary microsoft shitty replacement for flash
>the future of linux
Eli Gonzalez
what the fuck am I reading here
are you ok user?
Lincoln Wilson
based retard
Jordan Allen
You mean i can't use the internal wifi of my laptop at all?