Aren't Functions also Objects themselves ?
FOP VS OOP
Asher Jones
Adam Morgan
Just avoid mutable state
Logan Walker
What is that ?
Nathaniel King
OOP is for people with an inner monologue.
Kevin Miller
Function takes parameters, returns something. An object encapsulates values and methods
Ethan Reed
>Mutable is a type of variable that can be changed. A mutable object is an object whose state can be modified after it is created. ... Immutables are the objects whose state cannot be changed once the object is created. Strings and Numbers are Immutable
What does this have to do with the post
Yes
Sebastian Hill
Yes duh I know what they are but you refer to an object as "" it"" and a function also as "" it"". Would this not imply that functions are in fact 3 dimensional objects since you cannot separate movement from the moving body ?
Ethan Rodriguez
No, don't be philosophical
Gabriel Jackson
Don't confuse logic with philosophy user.
Philosophy is a higher power.
I am talking mere logic here.
Lucas Morales
Just did a double check, actually. If you mean the OOP object, then no. Computationally functions are objects
Camden Rogers
Wow. Every program i've ever read makes more sense now
James Lewis
Don't most people have a inner monologue?
Josiah Powell
> An object encapsulates values and methods
Not in Common Lisp (best programming language). Objects encapsulate merely data and methods can act upon these object but are entirely seperate.
Wyatt Wilson
greatest piece of advice I've ever heard
Leo Cooper
>An object encapsulates values and methods
that's a really vague and shitty definition
Nathan Jackson
cs 101
Michael Jones
Functional programming is the future. Keep up, CS undergrads
Levi Jones
25% of people do not
Brandon Turner
This. Initialize all member variables in the constructor. Then treat the object like an immutable piece of data. Fixes all problems with OOP (but then it isnt OOP anymore because OOP is an inherently flawed concept)
Jeremiah Cox
I like OOP
Austin Foster
FWOCKA