>really buggy in general and nobody disputes this >MUON software center is crashy >the file manager is unreliable >has a slow release schedule >devs just keep throwing tons of new stuff at it instead of making it stable >so many settings presented in a convoluted manner instead of keeping it intuitive and simple >ugly UI elements like blur and glossy shit all over the place that people try to disable anyway >outdated desktop design >takes forever to make look right because of how many tweaks you have to do >not many distros use it by default because of the above problems >devs are busy making KDE apps that nobody will ever use like ktorrent I mean have you ever seen anybody use that? nope.
How do we make KDE good instead of the mess it is today?
>>outdated desktop design Predates Win10 by a year. 11 is GNOME and I don't see KDE becoming GNOME, no.
Elijah Harris
>11 is GNOME lol no
Luke Wilson
didn't read, not using GNOME
Austin Barnes
KDE is the lightest usable desktop environment and doesn't look like ChromeOS trash out of the box (unless you want it to) also very feature rich and can replicate Win10 or MacOS effortlessly. I don't think your attention span is being used very well if your first instict is to complain instead of learning the DE
Luke Jones
>currently It had been dogshit for 20 years ever since KDE 4.0 zoomie
Whatever kid. But I was there. I saw it happen, the day I installed Fedora Core with new shiny KDE 4.0 and nothing worked. Overnight they deprecated the perfectly working 3.5 and it never came back. The people leading KDE project back then should have never been born.
user, I was there too. I stuck to KDE 3 (on Gentoo) for a long ass time.... before giving up on Linux as a desktop and going back to Windows. I still think KDE 3.x is the best desktop that has existed to this day. The runner up being KDE 2.x which was also fantastic. I'm still amazed that 4.0 was pushed out in the state it was in. It took what, like 5, 6 years for KDE to become "stable" again?
Dylan Ross
4.14, the last fucking release, was stable and they had finally figured out how to make keyring again instead of insisting double password clusterfuck KWallet.
Then they deprecated it and started over ROFLCOPTER TROLOLOLOL
Fine i'll bite it. >really buggy in general and nobody disputes this literally works on my machine, there were some caveats with wayland but ever since 5.24 they are gone
>MUON software center is crashy >he uses package manager's GUI
>the file manager is unreliable Dolphin is unironically one of the better, if not the best file manager available
>has a slow release schedule and thats bad because?
>devs just keep throwing tons of new stuff at it instead of making it stable as in contrary to gnome removing features and still being unstable?
>so many settings presented in a convoluted manner instead of keeping it intuitive and simple I didn't seen any issue in that matter but can you give me an example?
>ugly UI elements like blur and glossy shit all over the place that people try to disable anyway Just use diffirent style or install Classik
>outdated desktop design And what's the modern desktop design? If its anything like gnome then i'd rather stick to what's now
>takes forever to make look right because of how many tweaks you have to do The more customization the better, if anything and idiot-proof easy mode could be introduced
>not many distros use it by default because of the above problems That's the matter of distros, not the DE itself.
>devs are busy making KDE apps that nobody will ever use like ktorrent I mean have you ever seen anybody use that? nope. Krita is cool tho.
Lucas Sullivan
>software center cant work does it use packagekit? GEE i wonder why
