what could be considered a “suckless” linux distro?
What could be considered a “suckless” linux distro?
Wyatt White
Leo Gomez
With little to no packages.
John Moore
Only running the kernel and gnu.
Robert Collins
gentoo
Thomas Bennett
Good question. I don't feel I'm in a position to answer. But I can say that any Linux distro that has X11 or Wayland is not suckless because they suck.
Gavin Rivera
Basically just the kernel, bootloader, and a few terminal programs.
Noah Peterson
Fedora, Arch, Gentoo, Slackware & Mint.
Kek.
Nolan Morales
parabola
Liam Turner
gentoo and MAYBE guix but being "suckless" is not a good thing
Jose Hall
>distro
>suckless
Pick one. Linux will always be a heap of shit until it's developed as a whole*, without distros, packages and other gatekeeper middlefags, and it uses a *BSD like ports tree for more software.
*It doesn't matter who this organization is. It may be Linus and his henchmen, it can be GNU, but distros will always be shit.
Gavin Murphy
source for that gif?
Andrew Brown
Use SauceNAO, just click the triangle and select SauceNAO
>Mardock Scramble
Jose Martin
Slackware, since it's basically Pat-BSD with ports (slackbuilds + sbotools)
Jonathan Morris
thanks.
Elijah Thomas
You are welcome.
Nathan Howard
sta.li
Ethan Watson
Kiss Linux.
Samuel Morales
"suckless" linux distro doesn't exists.
"suckless" unix-like os would be OpenBSD.
Robert Lewis
>what could be considered a “suckless” linux distro?
Gentoo with dwm/i9 or debian 11 netinstall with xfce or any window manager.
Wyatt Ward
Alpine
Ryan Flores
you are wrong
Linux was perfect in 2013
Thats when it was infiltratred and is now shit
one of the things that made it shit was the "unifying" systemd