ITT we discuss non-x86 ISAs from the past (6502, 68000, Alpha, Itanium, PA-RISC, PowerPC, SuperH, VAX, Z80, PDP-11), the present (ARM, MIPS, POWER, SPARC) and the future (RISC-V, OpenPOWER).
You can also ask here for more information. Don't forget to check out the wiki, by the way!
How about some news? >A Big Week for RISC-V eetimes.com/a-big-week-for-risc-v/ >Earlier this week, Intel announced it would join RISC-V International as a premier member. Intel Foundry Services (IFS) will embrace designs built on multiple ISAs in order to compete with foundry giants Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. and Samsung. Intel claims to be the only foundry offering IP optimized for x86, Arm and RISC-V.
Landon Myers
I have two SPARC machines, Oracle/Sun SPARC T4-1 server (running gentoo and solaris 11) and Sun Blade 1000 workstation (running solaris 10 and openbsd). Pretty based machines, too bad Oracle is killing SPARC and Solaris slowly.
what's a good, dirt cheap SBC that has at least a 486 cpu and decent io? (preferably raspi style header, but an LPT port may work too) need something not shit to run some custom automation software that will be written on top of dos
Connor Mitchell
>486 >preferably raspi style header >on top of dos Just use a Pi Zero and emulation. That's as cheap and simple as it gets until you are ordering in four figure quantities.
Benjamin Hall
it's a shame, this is one of the more interesting topics Any Forums has to offer
Elijah Brown
Who is currently making riscv cores. Will Intel out-do them and create the premiere riscv CPUs?
Leo Phillips
>Argonaut ARC a based RISC architecture. shame it's a jewed (((licensible IP core))) that's most often used in Intel ME botnet cores. i have some routers that run Linux on ARC cores >who is currently making riscv cores me. need to buy an FPGA or ten to run it on, the logic simulator's slow as fuck
Noah Hughes
>me. need to buy an FPGA or ten to run it on, the logic simulator's slow as fuck I mean who is physically making them in a fab. someone is doing it.
Parker Davis
bump, please don't let this thread die while I sleep
Ian Perry
>that will be written on top of dos The fuck? Why would you do this? At this point it's a better approach to write bare metal Rust or something for what you want to achieve, unless there are external constraints you're not telling.
Ian Harris
>Who is currently making riscv cores. Andes technologies and others. >Will Intel out-do them and create the premiere riscv CPUs? Hard to tell, they fumbled it when they had the chance with StrongARM.
Noah Cox
>cheap SBC Check out linuxgizmos.com/ They have a huge spreadsheet with data on SBCs. >that has at least a 486 cpu Just why??